Forum Discussion
Adamonic
2 years agoLegend
@doubleome wrote:It's very simple, nothing that was a result of 2042 should ever be in a Battlefield game ever again, failed experiment if you ask me
Back to basics and start with a stable multiplayer experience before even trying something new or adding anything new to the game
This dev group is different. They are not BF vets themselves. They play RPGs and Plants vs Zombies. The same group that thought BF2042 was a great idea are working on the next title.
To me there was nothing wrong with an updated engine with new locations to fight at with some different factions, some new weapons, gadgets and vehicles, and maybe a new game mode or two, but EVERYTHING ELSE that was in a previous game would be there. So at worst it was a BF4 reskin.
ATFGunr
2 years agoLegend
@Adamonic What you’re saying, and I’m thinking it too, is they overthought the whole game. Realistically games in a series don’t need a whole overhaul. New graphics & new maps are all a series needs. CoD gets it. While I don’t like their game I recognize that they give their players what they want and have a good financial success with it. BF followed that at first, until they tried to put a little something for everyone in the game, and ended up with this mess. It’s not a good hero shooter, it’s not a good battle royale game, it’s not a good Tarkov game, and sadly it’s not a good BF game. Some of the changes since release have brought it back towards its roots a little, a little. They tried way too hard. A reskin of V would have been fine. Portal was a great idea, just needs way more maps. Hazard Zone is fine as you don’t have to play it but if you want to you can. AOW has been a hot mess and continues to be.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,987 PostsLatest Activity: 3 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 4 hours ago
- 6 hours ago
- 10 hours ago