Forum Discussion
kregora
4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Psubond I do know that.
It is a stupid workaround for a fundamental issue, how the specialists are represented, which wouldn't have been necessary, if the overall concept wouldn't be for a hero shooter.
It is a stupid workaround for a fundamental issue, how the specialists are represented, which wouldn't have been necessary, if the overall concept wouldn't be for a hero shooter.
Psubond
4 years agoLegend
@kregora wrote:
@PsubondI do know that.
It is a stupid workaround for a fundamental issue, how the specialists are represented, which wouldn't have been necessary, if the overall concept wouldn't be for a hero shooter.
Right, but i would be shocked if they got rid of specialists so we kinda need it
- 4 years ago
They do keep trying to turn it into something it's not and every time they try they fail.
However every time they make it seem more war like they do well.
Hardline tried making bf into police shooter- fail
BFV tried putting cyborgs and crazy skins into ww2 - failed, but then refocused to war again for the pacific update and pulled it back to tolerable
2042....well
on the other hand
everything up to and including bf 2 focused on war and were all remembered fondly
bf 3 and 4 again good coverage, everything looked military
bf 1 probably had the most focus on a war game and was one of, if not the biggest hit they've had, regardless of the poor shooting mechanics
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,071 PostsLatest Activity: 4 years ago
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago