the new update is a complete disgrace
I spent hours on falck and now they have taken the rockets out of her hands and given them to the engineer class. Those outside the engineer group were left completely defenseless against tanks, armo...
Forum Discussion
@murdocklawless wrote:I spent hours on falck and now they have taken the rockets out of her hands and given them to the engineer class. Those outside the engineer group were left completely defenseless against tanks, armored vehicles, helicopters and planes. congratulations, I applaud this great mind.
Yeah we got used to being able to heal and shoot down tanks but I think its better with classes the way they are. This is supposed to be how BF is. I just hope the next one they still let us choose what gun we want to us and not have SMGs locked to a certain class
all vehicles are in god mode now. you can't even destroy simple latv4, because you need an engineer.
I'm going back to BF1. If I have to play with classes, at least the scenario and maps should rock.
- @nukemetohell That was the worst game of the last 3.
@uadarthmaul wrote:
@nukemetohellThat was the worst game of the last 3.Not if you like the WW1 scenario and like to play a sniper. The maps in this game are awesome, the only thing that's bothering me is that it's infested with cheaters and EA doesn't give two sh..s about it anymore.
@murdocklawless wrote:
all vehicles are in god mode now. you can't even destroy simple latv4, because you need an engineer.
So it's working as intended. In previous Battlefield title you couldn't engage vehicles unless you had an AT class or C4 in your squad just like now. You shouldn't be able to be a one man army; BF1/V's action man and 2042's pre 3.2 Specialists were wildly unbalanced.
- @ragnarok013 I dont think vehicles being god mode is working as intended. BF2042 is horribly balanced in the vehicle department. And yes, I've played all BF's since 1942.
@ragnarok013 написал (-а):So it's working as intended. In previous Battlefield title you couldn't engage vehicles unless you had an AT class or C4 in your squad just like now. You shouldn't be able to be a one man army; BF1/V's action man and 2042's pre 3.2 Specialists were wildly unbalanced.
Where is it written who he should be able to be and who should he not be? You write as if you are the source of truth. No arguments. Why?
The specialists were perfectly balanced. The formation of teams and squads is not balanced. At all. Clear random. But you live in your own world.
Again. A small number of class system advocates have no logical and sensible arguments. Generally.
Their whining led to the fact that the budget was wasted. Now they are trying to justify it. Using statements without arguments and numbers.
Still, not one of those who are in favor of the update have answered my question: How are these restrictions making the game any better? What you're telling us (those who don't like the update) is: "Play the game this way. You'll be happy."
But why...?
"You'll be HAPPY!"
