Split a dying playerbase? Not a good idea...
I do understand the issue with snipers vs aim-assist but at least you can enter matches in a reasonable time.
Hello, @Daeyon-be
I added a small* section in the description in case the original title was too vague.
* totally represents a massive change and doesn't mean small in any way shape and/ or form.
Hello, @UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R
Yeah, that would be nice. I would like to add that my opinion on this subject has nothing to do with the performance and/ or input devices between consoles and/ or a personal computer. It's my belief that most computers run more poorly than game consoles like the Xbox Series X and/ or PS5 and the consoles are massively more refined.
It's true that personal computers can achieve a higher amount of fidelity being frame rate, lack of graphic settings and/ or more control over the title, but still I do think consoles are better for gaming in the long run.
I think that because personal computers will always have one issue forever in gaming and that is exploits. PC's have a double edge sword. They're openness allows everything, good and/ or bad.
The market for exploits in PCs is a huge business and it's my main reason why it won't ever get fixed, and certainly not for video games.
Also, this is my own bias, but most times I've watched people playing Battlefield 2042 on Xbox Series X / PS5. It looks strikingly better than PC gamers like LevelCap for example.
@Popa2caps wrote:Also, this is my own bias, but most times I've watched people playing Battlefield 2042 on Xbox Series X / PS5. It looks strikingly better than PC gamers like LevelCap for example.
That's because competitive PC players turn the graphics down to potato quality settings.
Hello, @OskooI_007
It should be known that I'm both a PC and/ or a console gamer, I'm truly unbiased as much as humanly possible.
There are only two things I can't stand in this world: People who are intolerant of other people's cultures, and the Dutch. - Nigel Powers
I'm very aware of the practices a PC gamer does to gain more performance and/ or reduced latency. My comment was mostly directed at how Battlefield 2042 on Xbox Series X and/ or Playstation 5 looks strictly better in terms of clearly while in motion.
Everytime I watch a video of someone on the latest console I'm surprised how clean the transition is (turning around with a fluid motion, even without motion blur), because I've never experienced that on a PC, and I've been building them since 2007.
It's my belief that consoles still hold a niche the PC ecosystem will never have, and that is optimization. I have a 160 hz monitor, with G-Sync, but still the console to my eyes looks and performs better.
@Popa2caps wrote:Hello, @OskooI_007
It should be known that I'm both a PC and/ or a console gamer, I'm truly unbiased as much as humanly possible.
There are only two things I can't stand in this world: People who are intolerant of other people's cultures, and the Dutch. - Nigel Powers
I'm very aware of the practices a PC gamer does to gain more performance and/ or reduced latency. My comment was mostly directed at how Battlefield 2042 on Xbox Series X and/ or Playstation 5 looks strictly better in terms of clearly while in motion.
Everytime I watch a video of someone on the latest console I'm surprised how clean the transition is (turning around with a fluid motion, even without motion blur), because I've never experienced that on a PC, and I've been building them since 2007.
It's my belief that consoles still hold a niche the PC ecosystem will never have, and that is optimization. I have a 160 hz monitor, with G-Sync, but still the console to my eyes looks and performs better.
Consoles run with Vsync turned on in-game. Battlefield runs really smooth in this configuration.
Frame-times are less smooth if Vsync is turned on in Nvidia Control Panel but turned off in-game. Even with Gsync.
Battlefield has issues with stutters and uneven frame pacing when Vsync is turned off in-game
