ah, truely a great idea.... if not for some rather glaring issues.
- Portal does not allow for persistent servers so no matter how good your idea is only a small portin will ever be able to see let alone play it at any given time
- Portal is riddled with just as many glaring issues as 2042... to the point where the spread can be so randomized that you might as well just wip out yaour pistol....
- DICE has not made any moves to reenable progession trough Portal and i would not be surprised if they just shelfed any notion to do so, you tought XP farms were bad, wait until the season pass drops and people rush trough it in one day trough bot farming.....
- with the dwindeling playerbase Protal looses its porpuse just as fast
i mean from all your comments and statements it seem more disagree with you on this forum at least then tend to agree.... so who is forcing who really .....
“….Superior game….”
Lol. Can’t even.
@Stew360 wrote:
@FlibberMeister
It is obvjectively a superior game , and if anyones with adaptation skills and FPS skills give this game design ideas and gameplay a chance they would realise that quick .. Most peoples hating on the game are stuck in a nostalgia bubble where they want to emulate a past experience ...
No need for a new games to emulate past experience unless the past experience is Offline .. BFBC2 and up battlefield are still all playable you can even still play BF2142 of BF2 .. So anyones wanting a carbon copy of BF4 can still play BF4 same goes for other BF ..
But the reality is if you objectively analyze lets say Orbital versus Caspian border .. Or Gulf of Oman versus Manifest ... I am sorry but BF2042 maps will win in terms of combat zones variety , complexity , design , etc.. For Conquest mode .. As for the new mode breaktrough there is a lots of objective portion that are not suitable and make its either insanely easy to attack or insanely easy to defend ..
The problem is your hiding your personal opinion behind “objectivity”. The game is clearly not objectively better than previous BF just yet.
”…and if anyones with adaptation skills and FPS skills give this game design ideas and gameplay a chance they would realise that quick .”
Lol, oh please. Typical kind of snide snipe comment. Does it make you feel big suggesting people that can’t play well are less intelligent than you. And I can adapt perfectly well thankyou very much. Being able to adapt to this game doesn’t make your statement any more right or valid.
“No need for a new games to emulate past experience unless the past experience is Offline .. BFBC2 and up battlefield are still all playable you can even still play BF2142 of BF2 .. So anyones wanting a carbon copy of BF4 can still play BF4 same goes for other BF ..”
in your opinion. We don’t want a carbon copy, we want an evolution that doesn’t tragicallly diverge from the core of what we expect from a battlefield game. 2042 has lost a lot of what differentiates it from other games. will it get it back, some perhaps. Will we agree on what that should be, perhaps some, definitely not all. For example I think specialists could play a role, but I don’t think the execution was right for bf. It was lazy, unimaginative.
there is a need for BF to emulate previous games though, otherwise don’t call it bf.
“
But the reality is if you objectively analyze lets say Orbital versus Caspian border .. Or Gulf of Oman versus Manifest ... I am sorry but BF2042 maps will win in terms of combat zones variety , complexity , design , etc.. For Conquest mode .. As for the new mode breaktrough there is a lots of objective portion that are not suitable and make its either insanely easy to attack or insanely easy to defend ..”
Maps might be good. But good maps don’t make a good game in its entirety. I’m can’t objectively say if bf2042 maps are better or worse than other versions because I’ve never really had a problem with them. And I don’t really have much of an opinion o. What makes them good or bad. Too much running is prevelant in most battlefields as far as I can tell.
also, you use “objectively analyse far to much as though it makes you right. And it doesn’t.
@X-Sunslayer-X wrote:ah, truely a great idea.... if not for some rather glaring issues.
- Portal does not allow for persistent servers so no matter how good your idea is only a small portin will ever be able to see let alone play it at any given time
- Portal is riddled with just as many glaring issues as 2042... to the point where the spread can be so randomized that you might as well just wip out yaour pistol....
- DICE has not made any moves to reenable progession trough Portal and i would not be surprised if they just shelfed any notion to do so, you tought XP farms were bad, wait until the season pass drops and people rush trough it in one day trough bot farming.....
- with the dwindeling playerbase Protal looses its porpuse just as fast
i mean from all your comments and statements it seem more disagree with you on this forum at least then tend to agree.... so who is forcing who really .....
@X-Sunslayer-X Bravo! *golf clap*
