Forum Discussion
X-Sunslayer-X
2 years agoSeasoned Ace
@MADMAC50K you clearly do not understand the point here... It is an idiotic idea to have the mindset that one infantry player should always have 100% ability to destroy a vehicle without putting in any effort.
The LATV is almost always available and can be called in at a moments notice to lay a trap for unsuspecting air vehicles.
The lock-ons are stupid because they are easily countered and I can not even begin to count the times I have seen Wildcat drivers use lock-ons instead of shooting their main guns at a heli within 50m allowing them to get away. The underlying problem is still that vehicle vs vehicle gameplay is an absolute bore in this game. skill has nothing to do with it 9/10 times if one vehicle has APS and the other doesn't its just dead or if its the TOR tank sitting in base you are just gone. Try and remember that teamplay starts with you
The LATV is almost always available and can be called in at a moments notice to lay a trap for unsuspecting air vehicles.
The lock-ons are stupid because they are easily countered and I can not even begin to count the times I have seen Wildcat drivers use lock-ons instead of shooting their main guns at a heli within 50m allowing them to get away. The underlying problem is still that vehicle vs vehicle gameplay is an absolute bore in this game. skill has nothing to do with it 9/10 times if one vehicle has APS and the other doesn't its just dead or if its the TOR tank sitting in base you are just gone. Try and remember that teamplay starts with you
2 years ago
@X-Sunslayer-X
I know the thread is mostly about air vehicles. But you said:
> It is an idiotic idea to have the mindset that one infantry player should
always have 100% ability to destroy a vehicle without putting in any effort.
That might be so, but not being able to kill a heavy transport with all the C5 you can carry is plain stupid. IMHO there should not be any vehicle (e.g. the CAV Brawler) that should withstand 3 C5. And while we are at it, I mus say that it is rather sad that forum rules deny us the ability to state what should be done to the person that thought it a good idea to add a 'Close Defense System', allowing this abomination of a transport to drive into an objective and wipe out half the team by pressing one button.
I know the thread is mostly about air vehicles. But you said:
> It is an idiotic idea to have the mindset that one infantry player should
always have 100% ability to destroy a vehicle without putting in any effort.
That might be so, but not being able to kill a heavy transport with all the C5 you can carry is plain stupid. IMHO there should not be any vehicle (e.g. the CAV Brawler) that should withstand 3 C5. And while we are at it, I mus say that it is rather sad that forum rules deny us the ability to state what should be done to the person that thought it a good idea to add a 'Close Defense System', allowing this abomination of a transport to drive into an objective and wipe out half the team by pressing one button.
- 2 years ago@ForumUser
This is why AT mines are superior to the C5. Nothing survives 3 of them. - VOLBANKER_PC2 years agoSeasoned Ace@TG_Maveric2022 Plus, you feel like a bada.. when rushing up to a vehicle to throw your three mines around it while it’s turning etc. 🙂
- 2 years ago
@VOLBANKER_PC
it pairs well with the smoke grenade.
Very few tankers reverse out of that smoke because they think they are safer inside the smoke if they do not know what is coming - VOLBANKER_PC2 years agoSeasoned Ace@TG_Maveric2022 I always end up getting lost in the smoke and get myself killed :D
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,084 PostsLatest Activity: 22 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 26 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago
- 4 hours ago