Forum Discussion
7 Replies
Hell yeah
I'd move to 64 variant and never look back.
64 player with all the maps in rotation; portal maps included.
Lets not get off topic im talking about the base 2042 modes. Portal is portal
I am with you we need a selection for smaller conquest/rush quickplays like in the last couple battlefield games.
On the other hand... portal is not portal. Portal is also oldschool server browser and we got progression in oldschool servers. I dont get the whole " deactivate the xp for all because a tiny portion of the community is xp farming even tho they could do it in solo/coop"
Just activate xp for portal jesus christ, when i wanna play hardcore with 48/64 people on conquest/rush i should be allowed to still progress.
It is not my fault that the system requirements are not fitting 128 players ... yea i am on the lower end for sure, but i am within the required system specs and 128 players is not running at all because cpu bottleneck like crazy.
1. Quickplay for more modes : TDM, Small Conquest/Rush
2. Portal progression because why not- @MotorizedKiwi Sooo in for this, was surprised it wasn’t there at launch like past games. Needs to happen!
- oSMiIEo4 years agoSeasoned Rookie
I'm really tired from these 128 servers! I can't enjoy the game playing in it! huge maps! and 128 of players is to much! just at least give us a another server with 64 or 32 will be much much better! with a small maps of course!
- UP_Jaskaman4 years agoSeasoned Hotshot
It's good that at least you can run portal with 64P CQ, but I agree it should be also possible to have in public ones, CQ / Breakthrough 64P.
128 P maps are just not that fun to play especially as an inf. CQ 128 is nearly unplayable as INF at the moment, at least on 4 of 7 CQ 128 maps unfortunately.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago
- 13 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago