What's your feedback on Update 4.1
As the title says what's your feedback on Update 4.1. It's very obvious from the various threads created so far that removing 128 Breakthrough mode is by FAR the most unpopular change. For everyone...
Forum Discussion
@RayD_O1
I agree, but removing a badly balanced and laggy mode as BT 128 definitely was with the intention to bring those players over to the other modes -- to increase player count PER MODE -- is maybe the only option they have left. It will definitely increase the number of players playing BT 64, even if not all players will make the switch.
I agree, but removing a badly balanced and laggy mode as BT 128 definitely was with the intention to bring those players over to the other modes -- to increase player count PER MODE -- is maybe the only option they have left. It will definitely increase the number of players playing BT 64, even if not all players will make the switch.
@DuaneDibbleyI understand your point about moving players to different modes. But if that’s the reason here then you might as well remove hard zone. Remove portal all together except for the weekly modes they always rotate in. I saw more players in 128 than in those modes I mentioned. Also remove 64 conquest because I have yet to even see anyone play that.
@Sc0tch_Whiskey wrote:@DuaneDibbleyI understand your point about moving players to different modes. But if that’s the reason here then you might as well remove hard zone. Remove portal all together except for the weekly modes they always rotate in. I saw more players in 128 than in those modes I mentioned. Also remove 64 conquest because I have yet to even see anyone play that.
I can fully understand your disappointment as I know you have enjoyed the 128 Breakthrough mode (when MM allowed you access) so having it removed was not what you needed on top of the other issues you were having before the update.
- @RayD_O1 To me all that they are doing is putting a bandaid to a big issue. They won’t bring server browsers and I believe that. Even tho I’ll always make my opinion on that. Player count is low for certain reasons and they are not addressing that. Removing game modes isn’t the answer to bringing back players. It’s fixing the game where fans and players can say wow I’m having a great time and glad I have this game.
@Sc0tch_Whiskey wrote:
@RayD_O1To me all that they are doing is putting a bandaid to a big issue. They won’t bring server browsers and I believe that. Even tho I’ll always make my opinion on that. Player count is low for certain reasons and they are not addressing that. Removing game modes isn’t the answer to bringing back players. It’s fixing the game where fans and players can say wow I’m having a great time and glad I have this game.That pretty much sums up the problems with BF2042, and DICE have a long way to go to resolve the true underlying issues that have reduced the player base to such low levels.
Dice should replace Breakthrough 128 mode with an uninstall button...🙌
@DeepSixxxx wrote:Dice should replace Breakthrough 128 mode with an uninstall button...🙌
Sadly that may well be what a lot of players do and BF2042 cannot afford to lose any more players.
- "Davos Dice" has a plan for all us plebs---> "You will not own any game modes and you will be happy"...
So basically now that angel doesn’t give out armor, if you play as Faulk and equipped with ammo box, angel and and Faulk is pretty much the same lol
@Sc0tch_WhiskeyYeah, but in reality they are the only specialists that resemble anything from earlier games (Support/Medic).
I think they are ok, BF should never have had body-armor in the first place (just like passive spotting/shooting turrets, robot-dogs, wingsuits, zip-lines etc, also are "fails"). We need team-play not "heroes" running around lone-wolfing.- @cso7777 I particularly like the Apocalypse DLC maps, River Somme and Passchendaele are good maps and Caporetto can be a bit difficult at times lol
After 2 franchise games with a regrettable live service, I miss Premium Pass.
