@59hushy6ywi8
There was no vision for the launch state of 2042.
Only a corporate checkbox list with the Battlefield brand placed on the title.
I loathe when artists want to flex their creative freedom while trying to reuse the past success of a brand that may not even have been of their own creation.
It is the same with how we get all these subpar reimaginings, remakes, sequels on cinema.
If they have a "vision" for something different, they should have the balls to start a new IP, just like Lars is doing right now with his new studio.
LOL yup, all the parts were there alright, everything except players....
Just because you keep repeating the same nonsense over and over again doesn't make it true.
This game is in a FAR better state today than it was even a few months ago.
It doesn't sound to me like you EVER liked Battlefield and prefer the Arena shooters/COD/Apex style of gameplay.
No, what you are stating is an OPINION, the facts don't bear out your OPINION, yet you continue to cling to it.
The FACTS are when this game launched according to Steam numbers (the only metric we have unfortunately) player counts immediately started to plummet, plateauing at a measly 3000-5000 peak player counts and 2000-3000 average players in a 24-hour period.
Since the first update (Season 1) player counts have steadily improved to where we are now with 18000-21000 peak player counts and 7000-9000 average player counts in a 24-hour period.
These FACTS are why your OPINION that the game is somehow worse now and sinking due to the improvements/changes being made is in fact nonsense.
