Why are all the anti-tank weapons so bad?
It feels like hitting a tank with a rubber bullet, it does so little and it's more of an inconvience than a threat . Like the only weapon I can even consider decent in terms of being a good anti-vehi...
Forum Discussion
@AngrySquid270 BF1 had regenerating ammo? BF4 had bonus damage? Have you even played any of those game?
Rocket launchers do the same damage as in previous games. Only difference you get less of them. Because imagine 64 players having access to a rocket launcher with 7+ rockets. The spam would be absolutely insane.
Rocket launchers do the same damage as in previous games. Only difference you get less of them. Because imagine 64 players having access to a rocket launcher with 7+ rockets. The spam would be absolutely insane.
@UP_LordPlumber Wait a minute, the vehicles did not have acces to both countermeasures ánd instant repair. Nor was finding ammo for the launchers a difficult thing to do. And you only got those 7+ rockets when you unlocked all the squad perks in BF4.
- @Wargame_Enj0yer Still you got 5 by default + 2 with squad perk compared to 3+1 in 2042
And please, finding ammo was as rare as it is now. Maybe even more difficult since most would run Assault. Supports were mostly camping mortards or ucavs. Ammo bags/pouches were few and far between.
Also tanks were strongers. They had huge amount of different ammo types, canister shells, thermal/IR vision, reactive armor+APS as well as AGM+soflam all in one extremely fast and agile package.
2042 MBTs are slow, cumbersome and have little to no variety. All they do is camp most of the time.
