Forum Discussion
- ThaDruSta3 years agoNew Rookie
i feel that sniper glare should react appropriately to all light sources. the same goes for any type of sight or uh glass type things i guess. especially if you use ray tracing right? consideration to real life light refraction and whatnot. also what's up with enemy grenade markers it always seems like too much if you ask me? anyway in the early days of battlefield i was wondering why so many snipers had flashlight attachments. was like dang these snipers trying to blind me, can't see exactly what im shooting from way back where i'm at. despite being so visible haha. negatively affects both sides. for real like i don't need all that to find them and its bs they are so visible for them. ok flashlight here head should be about right there? meanwhile they are focused easily on my head.
 - 3 years ago@turtlebeached Where do you draw the line between camping and defending? It's a necessary 'evil'. Good campers can annoy a whole team and throw them off balance. A bad camper, well that's a lot of easy melee's.
- 3 years ago@59hushy6ywi8 personally I enjoy going snipe hunting. Defribs, blow torch, C5, vehicle call ins and anything else that will kill the little pests. Yes they are annoying to most and scope glare is essential for locating the lazy fornicators in hardcore. No kill cam or "skill screen" to give you a clue.
- 3 years ago@turtlebeached I did too. Before the great nerf I made great use of all my tools to remove pests, whether flying, camping, sniping, whatever. C5 when I could get close, railgun for when I couldn't.
 
 
 
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago
 - 11 hours ago
 - 2 days ago