Forum Discussion
I would like to hear your side as to why you think Battle Royales don't belong in the Battlefield series, but only if you want to.
For example, Why would someone who doesn't have any ambitions and/ or interest to play Battle Royales care if others do. I don't understand why anyone would care if others got to play them in the same setting.
The more I listen to the ideas of the older fans of the series I do see a recurring biased opinion, and/ or notion that Battlefield should never change, but in all honestly it's so much less like it's original, then it ever has.
I don't see the point in Team Death Match in Battlefield but you won't find me demanding its removal or that it shouldn't be included because I know many people do like it.
Indeed, I hate hardcore but hope there is hardcore so that the masochists stop demanding core be changed to suit them more!
- Anonymous5 years agoNot applicable
Yeah, I'm the same way. I might dislike something, but I won't go and just let no one enjoy it because of that.
A side topic, I really wish Conquest had more to it. Like during the beta, that map Orbital just felt so empty at times. I really wish Conquest had more roles for each capture spot. Like each section and/ or flag offered the players a unique vehicle, weapon and/ or experience to entice players to want to defend them.- Trokey665 years agoSeasoned Ace@Popa2caps True, I often felt you should have to do more on a flag to cap it than just stand there, not sure what but something.
- SirBobdk5 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Trokey66 wrote:
@Popa2capsTrue, I often felt you should have to do more on a flag to cap it than just stand there, not sure what but something.Agree, it could be a radio where you had to change the frequency and use it to call in vehicles. Then we could also get vehicle spawn back on flags to make them more important.