Forum Discussion
Nobody is forced to play 128 players. If you don't like 128 player AoW stop being lazy and make a portal server of the maps you want with 64 players and advertise it to folks in various places.
- Sch1ll13 years agoNew Hotshot@protoman23 In other words create a server for an almost dead part of the game and hope to fill it up. Makes sense if portal wouldn't be so dead.
- doubleome3 years agoSeasoned Ace
Getting kinda sick of waiting, this game has been released for over a year and we get the content we want sometimes but not all the time...... clearly a huge part of the community is sick of 128 chaos in a game where many weapons are laser beams, with insane damage over range, where you are spotted 24/7, console aimbot is overtuned and vehicle spam is just insane with gunner seats being the most powerful they have ever been.
This marketing focused forced gameplay every since EA came up the new Battlefront is fun for litterly 2 weeks and you get sick of the chaotic nature, you have no control, everything is messy and unpredictable everything you dont' want in a video game. Yes the first 2 weeks of 2042 I was amazed with the feeling of chaos of war and action but it get's really annoying when you are just a pawn in this chaotic mess. This game has one gamemode and it's called chaos nothing else.
For me personally
Conquest3 flag 16/24 players
5 flag 32/48 players
7+ flag 64 players
And no sections
When I play 2042 I get Planetside vibes sometimes and I think that’s a big fail for Battlefield, that or being compared to COD.
- 3 years ago@doubleome Well said!
Interestingly on the latest podcast we learnt that Flashpoint was designed for 64 players.
128 player is like an albatross dragging Dice down at this point to the point that the last 2 maps are clearly not fit for 128 player conquest but it's what they sold the game on so we are stuck with it.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 11 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago
- 3 days ago