Why four squad members instead of five?
I just want to answer this simple question. Don’t tell me why five instead of four. At worst five gives you some room if one member isn’t PFTOing
Forum Discussion
@SAMURI_FAPBecause it's the same as the amount of people in squads for Battlefields 3, 4, 1, and V?
They were all squads of 4.
BF4 had 5 men fireteams, BF2 six men fireteams. I forgot BF vietnam or 1942, I don't even remember if squads were a thing honestly.
@Kekkset wrote:
BF4 had 5 men fireteams, BF2 six men fireteams. I forgot BF vietnam or 1942, I don't even remember if squads were a thing honestly.
@Kekkset Correct on BF2/2142 with 6 man squads and 1942 and Vietnam didn't even have squads. Bad Company for console is where the squads were lowered from 6 to 4 probably due to the vastly lowered player count.
@ragnarok013 wrote:
@Kekkset wrote:BF4 had 5 men fireteams, BF2 six men fireteams. I forgot BF vietnam or 1942, I don't even remember if squads were a thing honestly.
@KekksetCorrect on BF2/2142 with 6 man squads and 1942 and Vietnam didn't even have squads. Bad Company for console is where the squads were lowered from 6 to 4 probably due to the vastly lowered player count.
Squad sizes in recent BF games were:
- BF2: 6. (first BF game I think w squads?)
- BF2142: 6.
- BFBC: 4.
- BFBC2: 4.
- BF3: 4.
- BF4: 5.
- BFHL: 5.
- BF1: 5.
- BFV: 4.
Featured Places
