Could be so easy, just a 64 player mode with exodus and following maps:
BF players be like:
Players: 128 sux dice you ruined the game just remove it
Dice: introduces 64 player mode + older maps there
Players: Noooo 64 players mode destroys 128 because no one plays 128
Dice: removes 64 player mode
Players: nooooo bring it back
WTH people? What is wrong with you all?
i have been playing battlefield games for a long time...and I never said that, I never liked 128 game modes and maps... Iam an oldschool 64 conquest player....
@Roche__0_o So instead of taking game modes away, just leave them all in the game for people to play. If you like 64 player modes, you get to play them and if you like 128 player modes, you get to play them. Pretty damn simple really. At least you would think so.
@Chief2GFD wrote:@Roche__0_o So instead of taking game modes away, just leave them all in the game for people to play. If you like 64 player modes, you get to play them and if you like 128 player modes, you get to play them. Pretty damn simple really. At least you would think so.
Sounds pretty straightforward to me too, let us decide how and what we play.
Do you know what fixes all of this, where we don't have to be force-fed only a select different number of modes? A Server Browser. Run a couple of persistent servers of each mode, and boom you can pick and choose what you want to play, where and when.
@Adamonic wrote:Do you know what fixes all of this, where we don't have to be force-fed only a select different number of modes? A Server Browser. Run a couple of persistent servers of each mode, and boom you can pick and choose what you want to play, where and when.
No, no, no MUCH better to just keep aggravating the players with random knee-* decisions.
Come on EA/Dice we NEED server browsers and persistent servers!
@CloverDeuce wrote:
@LlamaWithKatana
BF players be like:
Players: 128 sux dice you ruined the game just remove it
Dice: introduces 64 player mode + older maps there
Players: Noooo 64 players mode destroys 128 because no one plays 128
Dice: removes 64 player mode
Players: nooooo bring it back
WTH people? What is wrong with you all?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
āāā THIS!!! āāā
Why not just keep both modes?
@GrizzGolf wrote:
@CloverDeuce wrote:
@LlamaWithKatana
BF players be like:
Players: 128 sux dice you ruined the game just remove it
Dice: introduces 64 player mode + older maps there
Players: Noooo 64 players mode destroys 128 because no one plays 128
Dice: removes 64 player mode
Players: nooooo bring it back
WTH people? What is wrong with you all?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
āāā THIS!!! āāāWhy not just keep both modes?
I think that would be be the best solution, different players have different reasons for wanting to play various modes.
@LlamaWithKatanaYou have it wrong. Allot of people liked the 64 player conquest over the 128 player conquest once it was introduced. The map flag layout is significantly better with 64 players on every map except Exposure. Separate from that tons of players complained when Dice took away the 128 option because alot of players bought 2042 because of that. I think most of those people only play breakthrough.
2 different groups wanting 2 different things. It's makes sense. Dice just doesn't pay attention
Please bring back exodus conquest.
Push it, so they see it, what a shame.
DICE TeamIt will be back. We continue to rotate modes. Though Rush is now permanent.
I logged into this website because of this...
Not playing anymore until they add Exodus conquest back.
Hey, i like the updates and the work you put in to the game. Sad to see such a release on such a franschise it is and the reputation to fall. But atleast you try to make it better.
Here is the thing. Why would you ever consider a 64 player mode to be a rotation mode? It has been a core gameplay mode for years and its something that made battlefield being battlefield. Its cool that you add 128 player mode to give sandbox enviroment a new take on gameplay but dont remove and put gamemodes in rotation that is the core of the franschise.
The amount of player you frustrate just by doing such a decision is not in the right way of doing things. I make products myself and for sure, i do not remove an item from the shelf that is selling and keeps on selling and set it as a product that is there sometimes because then i loose customers. How could that even be a thought to do?
If you have a new dev team or team that runs the game with new ideas, you should bring back the old ideas to have a 64 player mode.
Do you try to actually be out of touch with the player base and treat them like aliens? Rotation on core gameplay modes should not exist. Rotation should only be on experimental gameplay modes...
Im going to play the game when 64player mode is back as a permanent mode..
Yep, 64 players mode needs to come back ASAP!
bump
Judging by the number of posts / threads requesting this I think DICE need to be looking to make this mode permanent.
Hello? Conquest x64? the *snip* is happening? DICE YOU HAVE PEOPLE that cannot play 128 cause is *snip*! and not optimiced!!!
(CM: Edited to merge posts and remove profanity per forum rules)
THEY want to do a system of rotation, who cares what we think. Also can you image the ego trauma their management would suffer if they admit that 128 is a sile of piite and they will keeping 64 CQ permanently because the players just want a decent experience like they have always previously had. 128 was nothing but a genitalia measuring contest.
DICE Team
