why was lis buffed?
Her TGM missile was already insanely strong and I was able to basically remove all air vehicles in the match but a 600m range with an even tighter turning speed is crazy. Hitbox increase won't even m...
Forum Discussion
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@Padding_Ur_Stats wrote:
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@ATFGunr350 or 600m makes no difference from the tank perspective
1 sentinel and all the liz missiles are just harmless fireworksWhich is why when I spot a tank parked, I look for the sentinel first, destroy it the target the tank
I have fixed this by putting the shield down first then the sentinel behind the shield ^_^
Or behind rocks etc
This is a good example of things one can do to increase their survivability. So many posts here about nerfing others, rather then thinking about what they can do, or use, to increase their time on the map. Hawkeye didn't ask DICE to make it easier for him, he just looked at his resources and made good decisions. Skill isn't just about aiming.
Battlefield gives one the tools to succeed. It is not DICE's job to make you invulnerable. Hawkeye's response shows what one can do to increase their time on the map. In addition, he can use a repair tool if people get through his shield and sentinel. These steps take up a lot of offensive resources. Cooldowns, running out of ammo become a strat for pilots to remain on the map.
And remember, he is just 1 person. Imagine if people used teamwork with their pilots!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!
@Padding_Ur_StatsMy most played videogames of my childhood are real time strategy games. It helps get someone to the mindset of adapting to counter the foes instead of doubling down on some favorite loadout or vehicle.
I expected to see helicopters mangled by multiple infantry railguns but most people do not even use them because they are not as OP as they thought
@ OP
I have lost count of the times that the liz missile expires before it can reach a retreating helicopter. It was simply not good enough for the job.
Also they are also increasing the hitbox of the missile so the pro night-bird pilots will have an even easier time gunning the missiles down
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:@Padding_Ur_StatsMy most played videogames of my childhood are real time strategy games. It helps get someone to the mindset of adapting to counter the foes instead of doubling down on some favorite loadout or vehicle.
We haven't always agreed, but I have come to respect your responses. They're thoughtful and backed with experience, without the need for Hyperbole. That is what these boards are for.
We have seen DICE does read them. It is helpful for the game when people bring real data, experience, and can communicate that information effectively. *tips hat*
@Padding_Ur_Stats wrote:
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:@Padding_Ur_StatsMy most played videogames of my childhood are real time strategy games. It helps get someone to the mindset of adapting to counter the foes instead of doubling down on some favorite loadout or vehicle.
We haven't always agreed, but I have come to respect your responses. They're thoughtful and backed with experience, without the need for Hyperbole. That is what these boards are for.
We have seen DICE does read them. It is helpful for the game when people bring real data, experience, and can communicate that information effectively. *tips hat*
Well it is not like people generally agree 100% at most things.
Being able to pit opinions against each other is the intended use of a forum. Multiple minds examining something from different viewpoints and hopefully finding where the middle ground is.
It would had been nice if we could interact more with game devs/teams like we used to in the past when gaming was less mainstream. But with the way that these days one's statements can get them in trouble, I guess they are really worried about making anything other than approved posts. I would also be if I was them.
So we can only hope that the CM team will silently pass on our feedback on the relevant staff. I am at least certain that they are reading pretty much everything even when they do not chime in.
