You do not miss the Metro..?
I think the new METRO operations in battlefield mode 2042 would be great. A map of such parameters is missing. Bandar desert was great too. I'm just afraid it will be added to the portal mode. The p...
Forum Discussion
I'm more of a Metro man but that's because I knew exactly how to take advantage of its flanks - Locker was a great map but it was so much larger and more open, it was easy for the enemy to eventually get around to ruin everything (you just couldn't trust your teammates after BF3 IMO).
It's be cool to see it make a triumphant return, but I also don't want to see it become a mere shell of its former self like Call of Duty's Nuketown
@TTZ_Dipsy wrote:I'm more of a Metro man but that's because I knew exactly how to take advantage of its flanks - Locker was a great map but it was so much larger and more open, it was easy for the enemy to eventually get around to ruin everything (you just couldn't trust your teammates after BF3 IMO).
It's be cool to see it make a triumphant return, but I also don't want to see it become a mere shell of its former self like Call of Duty's Nuketownyea, these days you can have a teammate protecting a door and you look the other way and get shot in the back and he is fine, probably picking his nose
@TTZ_Dipsy wrote:I'm more of a Metro man but that's because I knew exactly how to take advantage of its flanks - Locker was a great map but it was so much larger and more open, it was easy for the enemy to eventually get around to ruin everything (you just couldn't trust your teammates after BF3 IMO).
It's be cool to see it make a triumphant return, but I also don't want to see it become a mere shell of its former self like Call of Duty's NuketownSame here, Lockers was too easy to flank and there was never that tug of war feeling you got with Metro fighting one flag at a time.
Lockers played more like a TDM match than a conquest match.
