Graphics settings don't matter?
I just now tried to lower my graphics settings, ultra, high, medium, low. They don't give me an FPS boost. I do have the RTX enabled, but that shouldn't matter a lot, should it? I mean, DLSS and all ...
Forum Discussion
@ATFGunr Yeah, after preordering the Garbagefield 2042 I sort of regret it... And so the next game - will definitely not preorder. We'll see how deep they are diggin the hole for themselves, but for the next game, I'll watch TONS of reviews, will do my best to find TONS of videos with roughly the same config as my next comp will be, and overall, we'll see how bad it'll be. If, however, it'll be in a good condition (not in "acceptable", but good) I will probably buy it. If it'll suck just as much as Garbagefield 2042 (or even worse?), I will not. And something tells me most other players will do the same...
@meeha2 I’ve ridden out the troubles in 3, 4, and V. 2042 has been a complete disaster in comparison to those titles. I missed the hard start for BC2 thankfully. Those ones were good enough to hold the players to where it improved. This one took 8 months to get to a playable level, which is obviously too long looking at player numbers. It’s good enough now that if it had content, it’s be a good game. Still needs work, but it’s playable and relatively enjoyable, it’s just boring. There are lots of threads on that topic so I won’t flog a dead horse. A server browser would have saved it 4 months ago, players who had bought it would have come back. It’s too late and they’re not giving us one anyways, just seem to lack the courage to tell us.
- @ATFGunr 30-40 FPS and constant freezes is playable you say?!? OK then, no problem, forget about this thread and life's good... Sorry to bother you.
In general it is recommended to have the settings on low if one wants optimal gameplay.
Even with good frames per sec, the extra stuff often impair visibility.
In any case this might help
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/battlefield-2042-pc-performance-best-settings-high-fps/
- @UP_Hawxxeye Just read the OP again please... But I'll try the settings tomorrow. But still, I don't think they'll change anything... If the game can't run on low settings... But I'll try, just to make you relax.
- @meeha2 You’re the one who posted, don’t bite the hands of people trying to help. If you’re just posting because you’re frustrated with the game that’s cool, but be more clear that it’s rhetorical and you’re just venting.
@ATFGunr@ATFGunrI didn't mean to offend anybody. I just mentioned to re-read the original post because the guy recommended me to lower the graphical settings, which I already did, and mentioned about it above. If I did, I am sorry, I just wanted to clarify the situation.
@UP_HawxxeyeI will test the settings now and will let you know UPDATE:OK, I ran the game, with MSI Afterburner recording my stats, and it just running, not recording. So MSI Afterburner shows that on average, I have about 35-40 FPS, and minimum was 27. The MSI Afterburner's file shows the graph, and so it's sort of hard to track everything, such as lowest score, but either way, that's... my usual gameplay FPS for Garbagefield 2042. Sorry, I just can't call it Ba... Ba... Nope, sorry, just can't. Because this game isn't Battlefield. It's glitchy, it's laggy, it has "specialists" nobody is interested in... So this is not Battlefield. Or at least, I can't call it like that. (I just have to note it, there most probably were bugs even in BF3/4 and other games, but... to some extent, 99% of them were so minor nobody paid much attention to them, because you had to have a super sharp eye to see them (once again, please excuse me if I'm wrong; for over 700 hours I spend on BF4, I may have seen a bug or two at most, which I don't remember anymore - so minor they were, so I consider it to be a pretty well made game))
