BF6 Needs More Vehicles helicopters and Jets

I don't care if I'm boring you.

And stop acting like you are "ALL THE PEOPLE" on this forum or that you represent the player base. You're nothing. You're just a frustrated old creep still fantasizing about a 25-year-old game.

And you clearly need to take your pills, because you keep imagining things in my posts that I never wrote. I SAID 2 LAND VEHICLES AND 2 AIR VEHICLES. NOT 1.

Am I talking to someone with a mental disorder?

Please leave. (Humanity too, if possible.)

Clearly imagining it ;) "Clearly not agree. Dont want to play war of tank. 1 heli / 1 jet / 2 tank il clearly enough. Tank/jet abuse is the best way to disgust other player on infantry. The vehicle are well balanced actually. "

The original poster asked for more than 1 jet and you stated here clearly one jet per team is fine. , you are the psycho my friend perhaps you should take the pills, maybe then you would chill out a bit and be less hostile ;). Either that or your appaling english is the route cause of the misunderstandings which if it is the case I forgive you.

You keep going on like bf 1942 is the only battlefield I liked bf4 and vietnam were actually my favourites so you know, wtf are you on about you feckless cretin!

You are embarrassing… The initial post said: “More Vehicles with atleast each side 2 or 3 jet  , helicopters”

IT MEANS 2 OR 3 JETS OR HELICOPTERS. Got it?

And I wrote 1 HELI + 1 JET = ??

2!

You are the dumbest human I’ve ever talked to!

And before trash-talking people writing in a language that is not theirs, learn another one, bro. And try to write yours correctly:

"appaling" → "appalling"

Another point: after saying three times that you would stop this conversation, you keep sending replies.

You can’t even stick to what you say. Are you able to go outside without someone guiding you and understand your own actions?

You have got to be **bleep** to believe that it means 2 or 3 jets or helicopters when in your quote it states quite clearly "And" helicopters (you edited out the And *LOL*). This means there should be atleast 2 or 3 jets plus hopefully 2 helicopters and maybe more if they include transport variants on release.

Oh my bad I made a typing error forgive me almighty god of battlefield forum in which you seem to think you are, we mere mortals are not worthy of questioning your idiotic points regarding vehicles just because you get clearly can't beat them in battle!

Well that final point I have to admit I agree with, I should have stopped talking to you when I said but your such an infuriating, irritating jumped up little **bleep**, I figured I wouldn't let the most annoying and loudest person win the point regarding vehicles which is what happens mostly these days. It's **bleep**wits like your self who make big noise if they don't get their own way spitting their dummy out the pram just because they can't handle another persons point or in this case game.

As I said at the beginning go back to COD and stop thinking your the entire player base, if you look at the entirety of the forums you will see everyone is saying the same thing. This isn't BF its more tailored towards COD and points like your's only justify the devs move away from the original gameplay of the franchise.  

"You have got to be **bleep** to believe that it means 2 or 3 jets or helicopters when in your quote it states quite clearly "And" helicopters (you edited out the And *LOL*). This means there should be atleast 2 or 3 jets plus hopefully 2 helicopters and maybe more if they include transport variants on release."

How dumb can you be… I edited it because it wasn’t exactly what was written in the initial message. I had to correct it to reflect REALITY, not your own creepy interpretation. You didn’t even notice before sending your reply… You’re getting more pathetic by the second.

About the number of vehicles: as I said, 2 air vehicles are enough (again, not 1 like you claimed before, **bleep**). So you think 3 jets + 2 helis + 4/5 tanks maybe? Yeah, sure, you should be in charge of the next Battlefield. 20 PEOPLE inside vehicles on a 32-player team… brilliant idea. You are the cancer of the old fan base of this franchise, maybe even worse than the “COD players.” Not even able to consider game balance before spouting the dumbest crap on the forum.

Sorry dude, you keep living in your weird fantasy world. I’m not playing COD, maybe Hell Let Loose, but not COD.  I never said that vehicle was hard to destroy **bleep**, I said it is "balance", you can understand that ?

I never claimed to speak for the entire player base—I’ve been talking for myself since the start of this discussion, unlike you, you crazy old fool. 

Oh, and just to remind you, this is your sentence: “Like I and other people.”

Again, you completely missed this one:

atleast ==> at least

Seriously, stop trying to trash-talk someone who’s clearly leagues better than you in your own mother tongue… You’re just embarrassing yourself.

I'm actually done you just write a load of **bleep** everytime thinking your making proper points about whats being said and all of it is just bull **bleep**. You write stuff then edit it then go back on what you said it is all a load of crap! Arguing with you is like pissing into the wind. 

1. I was stating you meant 1 vehicle of each type which would be **bleep** you **bleep**!
2. I understand that wasn't the actual title but tbh the way it reads it still holds true, and I wrote my response posted it then you edited it. So if I had not put that in my post then it would have just looked like I made the mistake when actually it was yourself you dumb **bleep**.
3. You can't just clip bits of writing to make it suit your purposes out of context like that 

   A-Takuji wrote:

   “Like I and other people.”

   the whole quote was actually 

   RobashUK wrote:

   Like I and other people in this post have stated

   Meaning not just me but evidencing other people within this post, keeping it relevant and inclusive of the others here actually.

4. Glad your running everything through a word processor now :) I can understand you much better thanks.
5. Stop replying in 2 posts your just a loser now **bleep** off and go play with your dolls you stupid little kid.
6. Go back to COD or learn how to fight vehicles better bows and leaves.
7. Blocked you for the peace of humanity and this thread ;)

xD “Write stuff then edit” – are you seriously not even able to read why I edited the post? You can’t understand that the exact sentence in the initial post was wrong? 

1-That wasn’t your sentence, dude. Back to school. Words have meaning—you need to improve your ability to express yourself. Even Koko the gorilla would be better than you.

2-Dude, you’re a **bleep**. You can’t even check WHAT I MODIFIED before trying to trash-talk—this shows how limited you are. If your brain worked normally, you’d see that I edited my post to match the initial one. But no, you prefer typing “LOL” like a complete **bleep**.

3-I’m just giving proof that you’re accusing me of speaking for “the community” with zero arguments other than your twisted imagination. And look at you, dragging other people into it to try to make your replies look stronger (2 people in this conversation, btw).

4-Words? Another delusion ? And seriously, when you make so many mistakes in your own mother tongue, just STFU when someone from another country is trying to teach you something…

5-Again, I’m not playing COD. You’re still living in a fantasy world—take your pills.