WEAPON SPREAD/BLOOM

Because in the long run game benefits from it more than it loses, preventing auto weapons to be kings of all ranges like in so many other shooters. Or, having a single meta weapon/kit with the lowest recoil, or easiest recoil to control (we once had this meta, with M16A1, and it was **bleep** to play). It's bland to see the same stuff over and over and over again, match after match, plain and simple. BF gunplay is about the three factors to control, while gameplay adds positioning (and now movement), gadgets and squad cooperation. And we're still missing suppression causing heavy sway, that should come back at least to LMGs. Playing around recoil alone is boooooooooooooooooooooring.

You hate it? Well, shucks, maybe this series is not for you. It's ok.

I want recoil on guns. I dont want people to be able to hold down the trigger and get long distsnces kills. All i want is the sight to show how the recoil is. Thats it. The sight should move around and reflect what the bullets are doing. Do you not understand?

They dont have to change anything about accuracy or recoil! Just show it in the sight! Why do you not want that?! You are legit fanboy arguing and not getting the point. There is some sort of language barrier problem here. 

The sights need to be tied to bf6s gun accuracies. 

Battlefield 6 would greatly benefit from implementing more pronounced visual recoil when aiming down sights (ADS), as opposed to minimal sight movement with bullet deviation from the center. This approach not only aligns with the franchise’s commitment to authentic warfare experiences but also improves player feedback and skill expression.

Firstly, increased visual recoil while ADS provides clearer feedback to players. In Battlefield 6, where weapons are designed to feel distinct, subtle sight movement paired with bullet deviation can obscure the weapon’s behavior. When bullets stray from the crosshair without corresponding visual cues, it creates a disconnect between player input and in-game results, leading to frustration. Pronounced visual recoil, where the sight sways or climbs in response to firing, mirrors the physicality of handling a weapon, making it easier for players to understand and adapt to each gun’s unique recoil pattern. This clarity empowers players to master weapons through practice, enhancing the skill ceiling.

Secondly, emphasizing visual recoil over random bullet deviation promotes fairness and consistency. In the current system, bullet deviation introduces an element of randomness that can undermine precise aim, especially in competitive scenarios. For example, a player with perfect crosshair placement may miss shots due to deviation, which feels punishing rather than skill-based. By contrast, visible recoil allows players to compensate through deliberate mouse or controller adjustments, rewarding muscle memory and precision. This aligns with Battlefield 6’s large-scale, tactical gameplay, where mastering weapons should feel rewarding, not arbitrary.

Finally, enhanced visual recoil strengthens immersion, a cornerstone of the Battlefield series. The franchise is renowned for its cinematic battles, and weapons that visibly kick and shake during ADS amplify the chaos and intensity of combat. This approach, seen in games like Insurgency: Sandstorm or Tarkov, makes every shot feel impactful, reinforcing the weight of wielding powerful firearms in a futuristic warzone.

Dsrtmosvkvsky, do you finally understand? Lmaooo

Do you finally understand, that recoil + bloom + sway is the BF gunplay, how BF balances guns, and that controlling all of these is the part of BF skillset? Because you can control bloom lol.

Idc what Tarkov has, if I wanted to play Tarkov I would... guess what... play Tarkov.

CHIEF_HOTSTICK​ 

  Your first point is an awful take that id say most fps gamers do not want, Recoil on guns is one thing but increasing it to the actual scope makes it feel awful. For a full on sim game and realism its fine leave that in those games, but for people wanting to play and get good with their own mechanical skill, things like screen shake motion blur and yes obnoxious scope bounce is not what most shooter gamers like. The gun drifting up is fine but they do not need to tie extra bounce or recoil into the sights or reticle.

 Your second point is also not true. It could be true if all gamers were legit. I too liked the skill required to control recoil over controlling bloom with burst. But recoil control is the easiest and most used cheat in FPS games. And having no recoil in a game that has recoil is a massive advantage and why u can get lazered across maps with an smg. where as bloom doesnt have that advantage, Even with cheats to maximize bloom control and bursts. The gap remains smaller. The only way to be good or to consistently land long shots is by controlling your bursting

Finally, i care less for immersion and more for gameplay quality and tight feeling mechanics on a BF sized scale which can also cinematic battles. even BF4 had bloom and was FAR from lifelike simulator and its one of the best in the series

i agree with you bro, "meta's" need to go from games. hell were having people out here trying to figure out meta classes. just find your play type, favorite gun and have fun instead of being the brainwashed sheep you will be. gunplay is perfect rn but i saw a glitch with it where i was using the ak205 (which beams but still has some bloom) i went down and get picked up and the gun was completely inaccurate, shooting sideways. so they will just have to fix that from happening. good comment dude!!!😁

👏bravo king say it louder for the people in the back!!!!

That is a bug, iirc you slide twice and it will be fixed.

Stryke07_007​ 

Your point saying most FPS gamers dont want the scope to reflect weapon accuracy is total bull because call of duty has used this very basic mechanic for the last 25 years and its why it has always been more popular than battlefield. Apex legends is an EA game which has been popular for years snd that game has excellent gunplay. 

What if i told you that youd still have to burst to use weapons that have recoil? Im not asking for a hold down the trigger fest like call of duty. Youd realize that if youd just comprehend what i wrote instead of shaking your head and thinking of dumb reasons to counter an actual good gunplay mechanic.

Youre afraid of a scope bouncing around and showing how accurate a weapon is? Does your mom pack you lunch and change the batteries out in your controller for you?

"and its why it has always been more popular than battlefield"

That's not why at all, and you know it. It's because it caters to the lowest common denominator, it's the most casual of casual shooters, has no depth, requires no teamwork and is just about KD with little skill required. 

that and on consoles bf had bad history of low player count.

so not only are they confused about where to go on larger maps, they also have less teammates to herd them on.

CHIEF_HOTSTICK​ 

you mentioned COD over and over in your posts, whats your obsession. I dont even play that garbage game.

And no ones afraid of scope bounce. but nice try with the tough keyboard warrior insult lmao. scope bounce simply serves no in game purpose and feels awful. ur also obsessed with "immersion" do u play wearing your goodwill army jacket while role playing tough army guy in your game chair?

How a game feels to play is far superior to immersion, thats why MOST gamers prefer a high frame rate to visual quality, its why motion blur, and screen shake are usually turned off. Things like additional "lifelike" scope bounce falls right into that. Only role playing weirdos care as much about the things u rant about.

Then; buff sniper damage, remove bloom, increase normal recoil, and add more movement distortion to sighting while moving and such. Maybe a slight blurr effect over prolonged fire. Just not bloom, it's more of a turn off than a 20min commercial in the middle of a movie.