So far I've noticed it's a lot of 32 v 32, or 8 v 8, but what I'm wanting to know is if we will see large scale conquest and other large scale modes which will feature 64 v 64.
Absolutely loving the game so far, and 32 players feels really good, maybe it's just me being greedy and wanting more people running around.
Portal should include the option to create 128 player games ( I say should because I have no idea if it will).
Tbh, I loved some of the big maps with 128 ppl in them.. With separate fighting hotspots on the map.. I have been playing since the original BF1942..skipped none of them. I am not new. But I would have preferred 1 large 64/64 map on the new one. Like orbital, I loved that one.
Tbh I agree, I think in my mind it means bigger maps and bigger matches, but I suppose so far 64 max does feel good and doesn't feel empty. I can find people pretty quickly.
Thanks for not acting like the first dude that replied as well.
The answer is no. The developer have already confirmed that the max will be 64 players for the base game. Perhaps the BR that comes later will feature more but little is known about that yet.
64 players max is perfect! If BF2042 has taught us anything is that more not always means better.
Think you can write that again without the insults and the blaming? I never enjoyed 2042 either. You seem a bit too angry at a simple post, maybe it's time to log off for the day bro.
What a horrible idea. It's already a meatgrinderfest with way too small maps and high pacing. Its because of people like you that we got an abomination **bleep** 2042 with 128 player maps.
There's a sweetspot in how many players there should be playing a certain game mode or a certain map. This directly translates to the pacing of the game. It's made very clear already that the pacing in battlefield 6 is way too high because of too small maps and too many players.
