I understand the conditions there. Yet when a player pays 2000 microsoft points for a server, That player will do what they can to get the up most out of that server usage until its expiration. The player is unable to control who and who does not attend the server without using the admins equipment available i.e kick/ban option. Wether the servers owner has 1 other player in the server or 23 other players they cant be held responsible if many people dont join & gameplay is in progress with 1 other. Gameplay progresses regardless of just having 1 other player in the server. All that a server owner can do is continue gameplay and hope other players join, If others do not join, The server owner surely can not be at fault for this. Every player who plays Battlefield 3 are wanting to beat there opposition in a game to become victorious. You would not let the enemy capture all flags and you do nothing so your tickets decrease and you have a lose against your name. Everyone is out there to win.
Of course like I have stressed, 50,000 point score in a game is a mere score to accrue, Yet can seem an extortionate ammount. If i was wanting to cheat i would have put my server tickets to max to make the game last hours & let player/players from each team capture 1 flag each and then take turns of capturing the neutral flag. Now that would be cheating cause it would create a astonishing amount of xp. I have seen players that i do not know have a 0 - 0 K/D, Yet have a huge score just from capturing flags on Caspian Border & I know the game is still fair, That is just what they were set out to do that round. Maybe EA/DICE should think about putting a flag capture limit until another action is used such as blowing up enemy explosives, supression kill asist, Any other action which stops the mis understanding.