Why EA doesn't make a BF3 remake and just keep it same way Valve does with Counter Strike? It's been 13 years of EA destroying Battlefield.
Everybody loved BF3! Imagine if EA kept improving BF3 what a game we would have today. CS 1.6, CS Source, CS GO, CS 2... All versions of the same, no need to make it different.
[Edit: All caps removed from title - ElliotLH]
Hello @arthurbcoelho1,
Making money is the name of the game, a live service game is probably something that we will never see. I totally agree that EA should do a Battlefield 3 remake in the future, but they should stay away from the live service format in my opinion.
Best regards,
danisoff
Why should they stay away from a live service format? Counter-Strike is the proof that we don't need a completely new game every year, just improve what is already well-made.
Think of BF3, everyone loved that gameplay, so what you do? Make a completely different BF with different gameplay? That makes no sense to me.
Maybe as they're killing the original game, servers don't work hardly anymore and EA (as many think) are letting it get to a point where its going to be closed, then they can say 'hey guys, its fine, the next battlefield is a full remake of ALL the maps'.
Of course, they'll release a base game and instead of the dlc's, they'll release one map every few months, and bring in all sorts of camos and what not that we can pay for or grind for 20,000 hours.
And then they'll say its a homage to the battlefield fans, from the start.
Or they could just remake Battlefield 2, as hardly anyone has played that, and the maps were great.
