Forum Discussion
23 Replies
Agreed @Trokey66 ,
Its one single bag of money with a finite amount available. But also the classic dilemma on R&D, if you dont put up the money it takes to make something valuable. You are not going to sell much of it down the line. So always going cheap is a self-fulfilling path to becoming obsolete, as competition has already shown they do better in recent days. So if EA seriously consider this as one of their absolute money makers and part of their core identity, then its not the place to do things half...
The judgement will be severe if they screw this one up.
@Trokey66 wrote:
@ragnarok013 There is every chance that money not spent in one area would been seen as a saving and NOT reallocated elsewhere.
It's what the large defence company I work for would do......@Trokey66 ah a fellow Defense Industry guy like myself! I understand that is a distinct possibility but it's also possible that they had "X" budget for Battlefield and this mobile buffoonery is coming out of it even if they planned from the beginning for that cost. The optics are just bad after the entire BF5 experience.
- Trokey664 years agoSeasoned Ace@ragnarok013 possible but doubtful if mine is anything to go by..... 😜