@CyberDymeThis is what happens when they do not expect more moneyz for the extra content in a live service game.
Premium was disgusting at times but at least it funded more content
We will keep getting such releases until we stop paying until they deliver.
Comparing A BF game to a CoD game is redundant since they are almost completely different types of FPS in their style. I would not even look at CoD even if it was the best CoD in history.
Lol when people bring up weapon variety in BF4. Everyone just uses the AEK or ACE 23 anyway.
@CPT_GASLIGHT wrote:Lol when people bring up weapon variety in BF4. Everyone just uses the AEK or ACE 23 anyway.
That is not correct @CPT_GASLIGHT !
Join my server and check it out if you will in spectator mode.
So of the 64 players on board, we typically only see 6-10 running with the same few select primary weapon. (e.g. a couple of Assaults with the same SCAR-H assault rifle, 2-3 with the same shotgun, 2-3 Support with the same LMG). And here again, near never do they actually run it with the same loadout of accessories.
So each weapon and its variations to custom fit your personal preferences are indeed used and appreciated by the players!
@Cemtexx wrote:
@UP_HawxxeyeBattlefield 5 as a live service game gave us more content in 6 months that 2042 has in 8 months.
It is the difference between the former starting broken at a technical level while the later was broken in both a technical level AND at a concept/design level (specialists and bad launch maps).
