@ragnarok013 ah, but you are incorrect. That is the common response given by EA: It is not our problem, talk to evenbalance.
You see, contract law stipulates that when one party "Contractee or Principle" (EA) enters into an agreement with another party "Vendor or Contractor" (Evenbalance), to act in some fashion based upon the writ of the contract, the person contractor (Evenbalance) that gains on the basis of action/motion on behalf of the contract, is in fact operating as an agent of the contractee/entity (EA).
Here is the Black's Law definition of an agent in fact:
A person or entity authorized by another (principal or entity) to act for or in place of him; one instructed with another's business.
This means that Evenbalance is a contracted agent in fact of EA due to their contractual agreement to provide anti-cheat software in exchange for money or interest.
So again: how is it that you think that there is nothing EA can do?