Forum Discussion
32 Replies
- @ghinavirus Wouldn't hold my breath on Xbox given it's a Sony first party game. That would be like Xbox putting Halo on Playstation. PC might be a possibility though. I wouldn't rule out a timed window of exclusivity on PS5 first, then on PC. Sony is trying to sell an ecosystem, so they want to get mileage on Playstation before they bring it to PC.
- @ArchAngeL-PCX yeah I agree. Want to hear some blasphemy? I think Halo should be on PS5 and PS4 also. Larger the community the longer games are supported.
- Roadmay4 years agoNew Ace
It's time to summon Bad Company 3 to save them all .🤔
- RaginSam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@Kona_uk What are these threads? Trying to find new ways to be toxic?
What a bunch of none sense in here.
The game has been out for a week… - Kona_uk4 years agoSeasoned Ace@RaginSam So it's a online game that should have been ready for release.
No single player campagin just online and you think it's fit for purpose?
Free to play come with less bug's halo for example.
Another Dice/EA employee on the forums - RaginSam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@Kona_uk They said it wasn't going to have a single player campaign. Plus, I rather them spend more time on the multiplayer portion of the game. The campaigns have always been okay, but there's so many other options for single player experiences. I don't need that from Battlefield and I have always felt this way.
Halo has been being developed for how many years at this point? F2P games still make a ton of money, especially with a name like Halo. Infinite is also doing nothing new. It's still the same format as every prior Halo game using the same weapons. I've tried Infinite and it's okay, but kinda feels too slow for an Arena shooter on PC. It's just kinda meh. Doesn't get me that excited.
They're both very different games and I'm not sure why you're comparing them. Probably watched too many "influencers" give their opinion about current games.
I'm having way more fun with 2042 than in Halo. - cornybbq24 years agoSeasoned Ace@RaginSam no single player campaign so they spend more time on the multiplayer… i’m glad that worked out just fine don’t you think XD
- cornybbq24 years agoSeasoned Ace@RaginSam Dude the game sucks… nothing wrong with wishfull thinking. Let us at least dream of our perfect battlefield game. Or are you an EA employee assigned to kill peoples battlefield dreams like all the other people at EA???
- Kona_uk4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@RaginSamWhat a ridiculous reply!! so your saying a online only full price game is ok to be released with dozens of bug's when a free game is basically bug free!! They have spent 3 years on it and left bfv to die to get it done. Time they fix it a newborn will be writing the code EA/DICE are on there yacht laughing at you.
- RaginSam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@Kona_uk Did you even know what you were buying? You said "No single player campagin". They never claimed there was going to be one.
Do you actually own the game? Are you an actual BF fan? It feels like a lot of people are doing everything they can to make the game seem like it's the worse thing ever. They rather see it fail than give any sort of criticism to help improve a game they actually care about.
If you love Battlefield like I actually do, you would voice your concerns in a way that isn't so toxic. This needs tweaking or this needs to be implemented. Not this burn it down mentality. "They're already done with this game and moving onto the next". I just don't believe people like you are actual fans or have any worthwhile intentions.
Just being a troll because that's what you find entertaining?