Re: Battlefield 6 Class concept

A thing that absolutely needs to happen in BF6 is to not have the action man class again.

The BF5 assault boasts both a lot of the best guns while also having a massive arsenal of anti vehicle tools.

Assault and engineer need to be separate again.

The problem in BF4 was that assault had the best weapons and healing and was (is) still the most played class.

But still BF4s class system is better than BFV/BF1. Medics have been pretty "strange" in the last titles (BF1 mostly mid-range, BFV mostly CQC).

---

@ragnarok013 wrote:
@UP_HawxxeyeThat's why I want the BF3 system back since Engineer with AT weapons had carbines and Assault had defibs and assault rifles. We also had no shortage of medics on the Battlefield unlike in BF1\5.

---

I'm with you on this one.

BF3/4 class system (without too many all class weapons in BF4) worked for me.

There was sufficient specific class roles with no one really limited excessively by range. 

---

@ragnarok013 wrote:
@N4v1sWhen BF4 debuted we all wanted them to return to BF3's classes (which were the same) but SMGs were all class in BF3 and DMRs were restricted to Recon. DMR spam is maddening to this day in BF4.

---

I think it was great that BF4 allowed someone to turn the recon into a much more fun class with carbines, spotting tools and c4

---

@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:

---

@ragnarok013 wrote:
@N4v1sWhen BF4 debuted we all wanted them to return to BF3's classes (which were the same) but SMGs were all class in BF3 and DMRs were restricted to Recon. DMR spam is maddening to this day in BF4.

---

I think it was great that BF4 allowed someone to turn the recon into a much more fun class with carbines, spotting tools and c4

---

But when Engineers spammed DMRs and all that 'pew, pew, pew'!

Bloody annoying! 

Hey everyone, 

I just wanted to give you a heads-up that I moved this thread over to the Battlefield General Discussion board. Thanks for sharing your ideas!

/Kent