AT Rifles should destroy buildings again
As someone who has played every Battlefield game since Bad Company, I may not be the oldest player but I’d like to think I have some experience to back up my request. First off, I have never been a ...
Forum Discussion
@TTZ_Dipsy I’m confused by this response, even if vehicles were no longer being effected by AT Rifle shots the one hit kill capability is a snipers dream.
So ask yourself, why wouldn’t anyone pick this over all the other loadouts? Because it’s not viable, even if it could still destroy buildings along with its current abilities it’s a very unforgiving gun choice especially at anything closer than medium range at best. You can play game after game and are lucky to find a single AT Rifle user let alone a whole team like you are suggesting.
The amount of counters is massive so like I said I don’t understand this argument.
So ask yourself, why wouldn’t anyone pick this over all the other loadouts? Because it’s not viable, even if it could still destroy buildings along with its current abilities it’s a very unforgiving gun choice especially at anything closer than medium range at best. You can play game after game and are lucky to find a single AT Rifle user let alone a whole team like you are suggesting.
The amount of counters is massive so like I said I don’t understand this argument.
@BlueSpy3DO You can still OHK infantry with the AT rifles provided they're within 100m (also assuming you hit them in the body rather than appendages). Any infantry target over 100m will require a headshot like the regular bolt action rifles.
