Forum Discussion
5 years ago
@TTZ_Dipsy I’m confused by this response, even if vehicles were no longer being effected by AT Rifle shots the one hit kill capability is a snipers dream.
So ask yourself, why wouldn’t anyone pick this over all the other loadouts? Because it’s not viable, even if it could still destroy buildings along with its current abilities it’s a very unforgiving gun choice especially at anything closer than medium range at best. You can play game after game and are lucky to find a single AT Rifle user let alone a whole team like you are suggesting.
The amount of counters is massive so like I said I don’t understand this argument.
So ask yourself, why wouldn’t anyone pick this over all the other loadouts? Because it’s not viable, even if it could still destroy buildings along with its current abilities it’s a very unforgiving gun choice especially at anything closer than medium range at best. You can play game after game and are lucky to find a single AT Rifle user let alone a whole team like you are suggesting.
The amount of counters is massive so like I said I don’t understand this argument.
5 years ago
@BlueSpy3DO I really don´t see the AT Rifles needing a buff. If you ask me they should have never been added to the game, as they are one of the most annoying things to play against. The force the user to camp and don´t require any skill. AT Rifles should be a gadget and do more damage to vehicles, but the OHK should be removed.
About Battlefield V
Join the Battlefield V community to learn all you need to know. Find game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.15,483 PostsLatest Activity: 3 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 3 hours ago
- 7 hours ago
- 8 hours ago
- 8 hours ago