New Anti cheat is not working in Battlefield V
Anti cheat feature is not working. I have seen Lot of player are using cheat such as fast speed, one shot dead etc. I did not see any use of this feature.
Forum Discussion
@Col_Larsen wrote:
@r1zky24just telling what I have read elsewhere. An EA/dice tech would have to chime in on this one. The problem as I see it - most of them dont use aimbots but wallhack - those are hard to figure out - as it is not shown in the stats. Good headset or can he really see through things - how to prove that someone is in fact cheating. And if they do not do client scans and verify the files (most likely they can cheat around that one) then it is really hard to be certain and ban people.
I have spectated soo many through my time on BF 5 - and most of the time I'm right ! Sometimes I can see that person was just lucky and he has no clue where people are. As a spectater you see all - and if wallhack installed you can see they steer towards enemy with no hesitation and shoot perfect through smoke.
Perhaps dice should start with code signing of files - I know it is cumbersome to maintain - but at least it will be a little harder to get past that.
Most of them dont use aimbots but wallhack
What a hillarous borderline ignorant statement from someone whom just quoting from someone else.
[Edit: Video showing cheating removed - ElliotLH]
hard to figure out
You're not a veteran and already ridicule yourself, if anyone kills another player 10m apart in less than 2 seconds he's definitely cheating, even if he uses a fully upgraded Suomi KP/31 or Type 2A, the fastest TTK in this game.
Looks like I'm just wasting my time replying to your chat, clearly you choosing side, who knows, maybe EA will hire you to be their new a community manager.
@r1zky24 Put on your glasses and read again..... I'm not quoting the entire text - but yest from spectate sessions - yes most of them use wallhack and not aimbot - not saying that no one uses aimbot !!
And I have not picked any side here - EA/DICE need to activate this - why else have it here. Another thing - remember as support when you fire into smoke and one bullet hits - that person is marked for all to see !!
To me it sounds like you are soo angry and about to explode - find other game - BF 2042 is not wrecked as severe as BF 5 is. Or play The sims :-)
And I have not picked any side here - EA/DICE need to activate this - why else have it here. Another thing - remember as support when you fire into smoke and one bullet hits - that person is marked for all to see !!
To me it sounds like you are soo angry and about to explode - find other game - BF 2042 is not wrecked as severe as BF 5 is. Or play The sims :-)
@Col_Larsen wrote:
@r1zky24Put on your glasses and read again..... I'm not quoting the entire text - but yest from spectate sessions - yes most of them use wallhack and not aimbot - not saying that no one uses aimbot !!
And I have not picked any side here - EA/DICE need to activate this - why else have it here. Another thing - remember as support when you fire into smoke and one bullet hits - that person is marked for all to see !!
To me it sounds like you are soo angry and about to explode - find other game - BF 2042 is not wrecked as severe as BF 5 is. Or play The sims :-)You insist on a wallhack this and wallhack that, even though OP wrote there is a speedhack and one shot kill, yeah everything just wallhack.
I'll write again, wallhack only works at close and medium range, 10m at most, higher than that is very hard because almost all weapons suffers high drop off damage.
Meanwhile, for recon, you have to be completely still for a headshot, even if you are lucky and have high skill, it is very difficult to repeat a headshot with a delay of less than 5 seconds because of recoils.
Not this BS "activate" again. If it has been pushed to the client, that means it is already on the server, it's best not to continue if you don't understand basic development and deployment. Battlefield 2042? Let the game rot, I don't like the SBMM model and the drastic changes they made. Players have also never gone through Battlefield V.
I think you are talking about the same thing from different angles. Think he's referring to old time rage aimboters, which are quite rare, and you mean trigger bot and silent aim users which are as common as wallhack today and is used in combination with it. It's when they want to upset people that they go into this classic rage mode.
I've seen on the cheat forums that EAAC actually gives the cheaters (hobby coders) problems and headaches, something that EAC didn't seem to have done, so it can't be completely ineffective.
Is it simply that, in their disappointment, these cheaters have been forced to turn to subscription cheats and rage now as often as they can, to arouse anger and distrust towards EAAC, so that as much negative as possible is written about this in the forums.
One thing is for sure, there were just as many cheaters during the EAC, the cheaters seemed to be much happier then and had no reason to rage to the extent it happens today.
@SpoolaZ wrote:I think you are talking about the same thing from different angles. Think he's referring to old time rage aimboters, which are quite rare, and you mean trigger bot and silent aim users which are as common as wallhack today and is used in combination with it. It's when they want to upset people that they go into this classic rage mode.
I've seen on the cheat forums that EAAC actually gives the cheaters (hobby coders) problems and headaches, something that EAC didn't seem to have done, so it can't be completely ineffective.
Is it simply that, in their disappointment, these cheaters have been forced to turn to subscription cheats and rage now as often as they can, to arouse anger and distrust towards EAAC, so that as much negative as possible is written about this in the forums.
One thing is for sure, there were just as many cheaters during the EAC, the cheaters seemed to be much happier then and had no reason to rage to the extent it happens today.
What's with this "wallhack" that's always been buzzed ? 2 clowns trying hard for virtue signalling.
READ.ORIGINAL POSTER.THREADS.
"fast speed, one shot dead" , naaahh its just wallhack.
I'm partially agree that former EAC has fairly good isolation, even though still exposed some of its process hooks. This new one is quite ridiculous, it already implies that doesn't support older Windows, why not just beat it and going all way through Secure Boot and Core Isolation?
