Forum Discussion

Re: Why did you add woman to battlefield 5

First thing, there were women in WW2

second thing, this is a video game, not a history class, people in ww1 don't have that many machine guns, it was very rare (just like women in WW2), and tanks don't drive that fast, but most people won't like BF1 without the machine guns and tanks that go 1kmh, the same here, I am making my own soliders, I know that I want at least my Assault one to be a female, I don't care if there was women destroying tanks in WW2, but I do want in my game, customization is one of that things I wait the most about BFV, and it won't be fun with just one gender

6 Replies

  • SofaJockeyUK's avatar
    SofaJockeyUK
    Hero+
    7 years ago

    Realism is important.

    I was playing Battlefield 1 today,

    In the campaign, I landed my biplane on top of an airship, then jumped 1000 feet into water without injury.

    That's the kind of realism we've come to expect in a Battlefield game.

    Oh, hang on... 🤭

  • ivrognard's avatar
    ivrognard
    Hero+
    7 years ago

    @SofaJockeyUK ...but...but...that was immersive and historically accurate, right?! It was the cold reality of WW I...oh, wait, what were we talking about?!🤔

  • SofaJockeyUK's avatar
    SofaJockeyUK
    Hero+
    7 years ago

    The truth is that DICE decided to show off lots of noisy action plus show a diverse selection of characters and cosmetic items that you can play as and with.

    That's fine.

    But this is one trailer giving one impression.

    It's like showing Luke Skywalker drinking blue milk and expecting that to showcase the movie (ok, that's not a good example)

    Either way, there will be more trailers and more gameplay to come.

    And as for DICE management, they frankly should have just said: 'It's just the first trailer, you'll see different aspects of the game at EA play', then just STFU.

    I can understand devs being upset, but starting to have an argument with the 'Boycott-EA' brigade, well you don't get anywhere with that because those individuals are not listening.

    For anyone else who is confused, the only remedy to that confusion is more content and more gameplay which will follow at EA Play in less than 2 weeks.

  • ivrognard's avatar
    ivrognard
    Hero+
    7 years ago

    @SofaJockeyUK Constructive criticism is one thing, forming lynching mobs is a different beast, entirely. 

    Both sides had some nasty derails (i've seen an article on VG247 that was insulting the readers that disagreed with the women's inclusion in BF, even if those readers expressed their discontent in a polite and constructive manner, while at the same time the other side went to threats, insults, name-calling and such). 

    It puzzles me how much bad blood i see on either side, how much venom is thrown, time better used in doing something better. All over a game that they did not see yet. It was mostly a cinematic trailer, with some MP elements thrown in. And that was all. 

  • SofaJockeyUK's avatar
    SofaJockeyUK
    Hero+
    7 years ago

    @ivrognard wrote:

    @SofaJockeyUK Constructive criticism is one thing, forming lynching mobs is a different beast, entirely. ...


    I agree. Looking forward to seeing some more information.

  • Moskolonel's avatar
    Moskolonel
    7 years ago

    The subject has been addressed in many posts, free to you to buy the game or not. The question of women is totally displaced because women fought during the war. Everyone is free to choose the skin they like, nothing is imposed.

    Players will have the same number of headshot regardless of the skin, so it does not affect the quality of the gameplay and the game.

About Battlefield V

Join the Battlefield V community to learn all you need to know. Find game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.15,313 PostsLatest Activity: 4 days ago