Balance Patches and Discord Monitoring
Can someone please confirm the following: • EA is monitoring the Discord Channels for 'Command & Conquer Rivals' specifically the channel 'Balance'. • There will be an up and coming balance patch i...
Forum Discussion
Constructive criticism from faithful players is good for the game, many games thrive thanks to them. Namely when world of tanks console became Mercenary, they worked with supertester contributors on that mode.
This game was very transparent all the way til July, before that we know what’s coming and would prepare to for each events, it was a very positive thing. Then suddenly all fall silent, a month or so after an earnings call article mention the game did not met E@ expectations.
we would love to support the game , but silence and lack of communication is not the way for any relationships, regardless interpersonal or player to developer.
I don’t think the players want more new units when clearly there are bugs to be iron out First.
fixing the games bugs then fix unit balance such as: OP cyborg and zone trooper etc, over reliance of tech deck, buff Kane, reduce Liang bro/sister capabilities etc etc.
who wants to support a game or company when their match engine SUCKS so bad,.....you want a better game just fix the STUPID match engine!!!.....no money from me and probably others if the earnings call reflected having such a SUCKY match engine!!!!!!!!
The only one that sux is the doubleharvesrerspam....
And in other games theres no lvlcap of units lmao.
@Cerinah106 wrote:The only one that sux is the doubleharvesrerspam....
And in other games theres no lvlcap of units lmao.
Agree with that one... a player who knows how to micro can easily pour out a double harv followed by tech or expensive units like Borca and APC. I for one would like to see double harvester outlawed until said player reached master rank at least once. I think the double harvester spam is somehow ruining the game.
