Rebuilding Harvesters shouldn’t be free...
Anyone else agree? I mean, the 100 bonus for destroying one is super nice, but there should be a penalty on the other side as well. At least half price to replace one.
Forum Discussion
It shouldn't end the game this early. Rush should only give advantage, not win.
@xrmiao4 wrote:It shouldn't end the game this early. Rush should only give advantage, not win.
Why should rebuilding Harvesters be free? Any other unit that you lose you have to pay to replace it. Why should Harvesters be exempt? If you don’t protect your money maker, it should cost you money.
The whole point of rush is just luck and micros. It's not like you spend tib to protect your harv then you will protect your harv. No, you will lose it no matter what. And losing a harv shouldn't be decisive.
and in no other cnc u get tiberium WITHOUT a harvester....
so why do you want to have costs for rebuild them?
imo its better to get no tib when u didnt build a harv. that would change the rushs over and over....
Speaking of harvesters, can any vehicle run over an infantry? This was because in my latest match, I was facing against someone who only used pit-bulls. I had a match with him earlier, and he used an orca as well. Towards the end of the match, I had his base surrounded and was about to crush it rather than irradiate his base. He ordered a harvester that spawned on top of his pitbull and tried to move to the tile where my missile squads/zone troopers were. I forgot which unit he tried to run over, but I end up smashing his base a few seconds later. I'm in the bronze rank.
@xrmiao4 wrote:The whole point of rush is just luck and micros. It's not like you spend tib to protect your harv then you will protect your harv. No, you will lose it no matter what. And losing a harv shouldn't be decisive.
This literally makes no sense. You just said that if you protect your Harvester you’ll still lose it. Smh. I just lost brain cells reading that response. And a rush is just luck? You can’t be serious right now. 🤦🏾♂️
Sorry but I disagree TOTALLY. When we have to replace a Harvester, we already have the re-spawn timer kick in so why be punished twice by having to pay to rebuild the Harvester as well? Now, if they’ll leave the re-spawn time alone, I’ll gladly pay a token sum to rebuild my Harvester. Just. My thoughts on the matter
