Thanks for the reply.
Any thoughts where I can get a comparison of the various chipsets?
On the EA website it list the Recommended graphic card as a GTX 660. My assumption was that the 750 was better. Even with the M. The GTX 660 looks to be a couple of years old.
There are many sites with benchmarking. The difference between a real (desktop) 650 and the desktop 750 is / was far smaller than the increase in performance between a desktop 650 and desktop 660. Laptops vary all over the place, depending on manufacturers, with only Sager giving you a good share of desktop performance with their gaming PCs.
Once upon a time, Toshiba laptops' GPUs werte "only" detuned about 15% compared to a desktop, while some other brands took off as much as 30% of performance. Here is how 750s of some varieties compare, desktop to laptop:
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-750-vs-GeForce-GT-750M-Mac
Hey, thanks for helping me with that. Really appreciate it.
I agree that there are a lot of varables, but I would have expected it to run a bit better based on this comparison.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-660-vs-GeForce-GT-750M
The overall benchmarks are close to the 660 (6.5 vs. 5.5).
I'm a heavy gamer and this is the first game that is totally unplayable. My machine chews threw Shadows of Mordor and the new Borderlands.
Oh well.
