I’m considering cancelling getting the game because they’ve overrated Norris again.
Going to go ahead and lock this thread as the back and forth and name calling isn't sometimes we allow on AHQ.
If you cannot post without attacking other users or be polite and constructive then we'd ask that you refrain from posting.
Darko
@TotosHeadphonesYou are probably right but lately i feel curious about reasonings for certain things..
No not really but half, theres an F1 vid of the drivers guessing and the youtubers slightly show them in their career mode vids today but havent seen much
Edit: Although i gotta say, giving Seargent and DeVries considerably better racecraft than Piastri is kinda ludicrous lol At least they got their pace right but its weird whats shown so far.. Hülkenberg worse pace than Magnussen.. Well thats what we get with no differentiation between quali and race pace.. Anyway..
@Meza994 Overall? 85/86. But I’d accept 87. maybe 88 if Charles and George were rated in the 90s.
@TotosHeadphones Nice strawman of me you bully. The ratings are out. And I had to put up with an OP McLaren despite being 4th in performance and Norris winning every race by 20 seconds FOR A YEAR. I’m not doing this again.
@GameOfEnder95Bully? 😂Over reaction a bit? On the previous post and the first post in the thread. As I said, is it worth engaging with someone who's not pleased with a some ratings and then throws the word bully around? You didn't even explain your argument in the first post. You didn't like the ratings, so you won't buy the game. You then go on to explain fully in subsequent posts. Your first post reads as a hissy fit.
Anyway, I'll quit my "bullying" and you can start another thread "Boycotting" the game.
@GameOfEnder95 wrote:I’m considering cancelling getting the game because they’ve overrated Norris again.
Sorry but this doesn't include any reasoning why you're not buying the game other than you feel Norris is overrated by EA. It's easy to deduce that you're not pleased with the ratings and it can be seen to quite extreme to not buy a game based on nothing else other than you saying that you're not happy with Norris' ratings from EA.
If you had added the reason why you had a problem with it, like you did in a following post (which is actually a fair and valid issue) then it wouldn't come across as it did in your first post. Don't say I smeared your post when you added nothing to begin with. I know you're frustrated but you simply didn't explain yourself and it reads like a rant
