Things I feel can improve the game

---

@Meza994 wrote:
@LiavealNo exactly that is what i wouldnt want because then the backmarkers automatically get closer which not everybody would want! But as an option rather that the backmarkers do more upgrades in first season or such..

I agree that all cars should have same potential, in one of my regulation change suggestions i had a system that would rate all cars on the same scale of upgrades, for all areas so that Merc would have the most upgrades for downforce but bad upgrades for mechanical grip (thats how it behaves IRL) which would make them have fewer and more expensive upgrades left for downforce but can upgrade a lot on the mechanical grip.. For Backmarkers almost all upgrades would be cheap compared to what the front runners have to pay -> backmarkers can do more upgrades. This would be the most natural and could be influenced by AI training (do most upgrades possible, balanced, few upgrades)..
Really doubt this will happen and i dont like the idea of R&D trees.. It forces you to do certain upgrades say weight distribution to improve your brakes which is super unrealistic.. And i cant imagine this ever being implemented as more possibilities of upgrade combinations need more AI training from my understanding..

Yes editor lol but i really dont know why you think Vettel would be underperforming currently when he was performing on top level the past weekends😂 But this doesnt matter, stats will always be a joke and completely biased as from what it looks like by the article from TheRace its (mostly) not even Codemasters doing the stats so we can complain all we want, Crofty and all who do the stats dont care anyway.. Best examples of not caring or not being competent are the experience ratings when drivers with 68 races got a higher experience rating than drivers with 98 races. I mean these numbers are very easy yet they get it wrong, so i wouldnt expect the ratings to majorly improve

---

The bigger upgrades would only be the first couple so that they closer replicate this season. Like one front and rear down force upgrade before they go back to regular sized. McLaren with slightly bigger upgrades would put them to where they are in real life after a few races rather than still at the back. If course just buffing the base performance is easier and probably what they will do with the performance update. I'm just of the opinion they should be at Bahrain performance and that the updates could be down via the upgrades instead. 

I think you're misunderstanding what I think about Vettel's stats. I think his pace should be around 91 or 92 but a default orange focus so Stroll is a bit closer to him at first. Hes performing well but hes still not at his very best at the moment. Although the last couple of weekends are a great sign. His 83 pace is a terrible stat and I cant understand where they got that number from. The focus stat should be better used.

For Ricciardo, I think he should have up to 90 pace but start in red focus so he'll perform more around 82 at first. Lewis should still have 97 pace but start in orange. Zhou should be around 78 pace, again orange focus. 

Yeah, the experience stat does make no sense. Gasly being lower than Norris like you say.. although honestly the experience stat adds so little it's not as big an issue as the pace stat.