Forum Discussion

10 months ago

Chemistry of Sissohko in EA FC 25 after applying a cosmetic evolution

I am reaching out regarding an issue with the player Sissohko in EA FC 25 after applying a cosmetic evolution. The cosmetic evolution inadvertently altered Sissoko's chemistry boost, which should not...

szsfgzsdg3434

10 months ago

The chem boost should be given the player card cause that is the feature, why would a cosmetic remove that chem boost feature then, doesn't make sense. hope they fix this bug soon

b24073

New Ace

10 months ago

@szsfgzsdg3434 when you go to apply an evo you have to read the description and in THAT description it was written
Here the only bug is the people who don't read

thermalboom
10 months ago
This specific case wasn't written in that text, but even if it was I think it would fair to ignore the disclaimer anyway as EA explicitly state that the Cosmetic EVOs only change the cosmetics of a card and do not effect gameplay in anyway. I think it would be fair to say that chemistry boost would fall into the category of gameplay.

If EA states cosmetic EVOs do not effect gameplay, and then they do, I think it is fair to raise an objection.
- b24073
  New Ace
  10 months ago
  @thermalboom "do not effect gameplay in anyway" it means that don't change the stats
  - PLWMichael
    10 months ago
    @b24073 Yeah i get the rarity thing but don’t you see any absurd here? Then why should we use any of this cosmetic things when they make our cards unplayable since they reduce chem boost?