Forum Discussion
If ea's reason for reducing the game limit was to get more skilled players to engage in the casual mode than that makes no sense because it might just push more casual players away from a game that already doesn't look very fun and inviting when you read reviews or watch unsponsored gameplay.
- lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran
I'm not saying anyone is "bad" when it comes to the AI so don't go there.
I'm saying people have different skill and tolerance levels when it comes to this game and the old format just makes more sense as a casual mode.
Unless there is an actual argument that can be provided in retort to not only my opinion but obviously the op's and others on the forum.
40 games is better and should be brought back because the current 12 game format is more completive.
To the decision maker: If 40 still seems like a lot then maybe 30 games in order to be ranked? find a sweet spot that works for everyone.
- 5 months ago
i think the IA is hard to manage this year
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@lansenyl You are definitely saying casuals are bad or otherwise you wouldn’t need 40 games to get rewards better than good players.
If it wasn’t about skill and you played at the same level why not play 12. What is the benefit of 40?
If 12 isn’t enough do 20 not 30. - 5 months ago
@lansenyl exactly a casual players is less likely to play more games - increasing the games makes it more of a grind
- 5 months ago
@lansenyl the whole point of ranks in something is to separate the different levels of players
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@rockiestroad Surely this is right. I can’t believe people try to say it’s hardcore to play 12 games and more casual to play 40. If anything casuals didn’t play 40 games last year and why hardcore players could get better rewards.
- lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs CASUAL PLAYERS ARE NOT THE SAME AS PLAYERS WHO SWEAT AND MAKE RIVALS AND CHAMPS UNPLAYABLE.
Some people would like to play more than 12 games a week and be rewarded for each of those matches. You are NOT obligated to play all 40 games or squad battles at all.
You people keep looking at the time someone will be on the game and that isn't really relevant because not everyone wants to play all 40 in one or 2 sittings.
This was a mode that someone who did NOT play rivals or Champs at all could play the 40 games through the week and still have a chance at earning something worth their time.
At the moment squad battles is very short. More people will be playing and most of those people will be playing on world class, legendary, and the ultimate difficulties. Someone who plays on professional or lower now stands no chance at catching up and getting the rewards they would've gotten in FC24 unless they push themselves.
This benefits EA because now those players who do not get rivals and Champs rewards will have to spend money for offline drafts and lost packs or just play their daily games and move on until next week.
From the perspective of someone who plays all the modes I can see how 12 would benefit you and take less time. But from the perspective of someone who does not play the online head to head modes they just had their only casual grind become another competition.
12 takes less time but makes things much sweatier. - 5 months ago
@lansenylYou are rewarded, you get 500+ coins per game and progress towards objectives.
And if someone only plays squad battles then the rewards are more than enough to build a solid gold team, then you have objective players too.
- 5 months ago@lansenil The most serious problem on pc is the use of hacking. When there were 32+2 games, no one wanted to use hacks to win games without playing them in person. Now with 12 games you see people who make the top 200 easily by distorting even the lower levels
Ps. sorry for using google translate - lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@R1ckyDaMan19 Then why is it a problem if there are more than 12 games to earn the points?
@b24073 I understand what you're saying. Hackers and those that have a better understanding of manipulating the gameplay are the ones that benefit from this because it's no longer a waste of their time to do so. - 5 months ago@lansenil exactly
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@lansenyl Right more people are playing and now everyone is playing all 12 games. This means you can no longer out play people who didn’t have time for 40. I think everyone agrees in the old system better players got worse rewards.
I just disagree with saying casuals are not skilled and need to play 40. I’ve had a lot of real life commitments this year and have been super casual so 12 helps me. - lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran
Playing all the games was never a requirement and they still would not be. Play as many as you want and place as best as you can.
There is no logical reason behind lowering the amount of games to 12. If you have your own personal commitments then that's something for you to deal with and work around.
If you felt obligated to play all the matches ontop of completing all your online games then seek counseling for your addiction to the rewards and packs.
I'm sorry but you're doing nothing to convince me that this is a positive change.
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@lansenyl I never played that many is what I am saying. So as a casual player I got less rewards. This forced casuals into the store last year.
A casual player shouldn’t have to rearrange their life schedule simply to try to play a game.
I could see if you couldn’t play past 12 but you can. Just keep playing if you have more time than someone casual. - lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs No one was asking you to rearrange your life schedule to earn better rewards.
But now someone who manipulates, or mods the game online may be more inclined to invest their time in doing the same in squad battles because there are less games.
If the gameplay was better and the anti-cheat worked properly then maybe I would agree that less games is better but 12 is still quite short. - RadioShaqs5 months agoHero
@lansenylI think people cheat no matter how many games there is botting was probably even easier on lower difficulty last year.
If the gameplay is better then you would like less games? I would think the more you enjoy it the more you would play it. - lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs If the gameplay was better I would still be asking for more games but your argument would be more justifiable.
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@lansenyl I would want more games if the gameplay was better. My argument would change.
- lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs I think we agree on something!!
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@lansenyl That’s why it’s shocking I’ve never seen so many say they like this game and want to play 40 games. If they like it I support 40 more. I’ve just never seen so many positive reviews of the game. I will just play less.
- 5 months ago
"I’ve just never seen so many positive reviews of the game" - where are all of these positive reviews? Once again, you (deliberately?) conflate the issue. People wanting to play more Squad Battles is not the same as a positive review of the product; it's simply that they want the option to play more games against AI opponents, as opposed to playing more games against real people. The actual gameplay is a different issue entirely. As is the issue of rewards for playing against AI / real life opponents.
- 5 months ago@Leelongy73 "I’ve never seen positive reviews of the game"
fixed ahahahahahah - RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@b24073 People say they like the game that’s why they want it 40. I wish they didn’t say it. I’ve specifically asked them and they say they enjoy it. I asked because people try to say everyone hates it. Sure ok everyone hates it then why would you want to play 40 more it doesn’t make sense.
People just don’t want to say they like it because it’s so looked down upon to say anything that might look ea positive in here.
I am not saying it so I don’t think the game is perfect and would prefer to play less but for others they really like it otherwise they wouldn’t say they do. - 5 months ago@RadioShaqs "they say" who? some friends of your or 30-40 guys? Trust me if i say to you that most players hate the game. We are in Ea content creator discord and we read complaints only . Every creators bring feedback from their communities and are thousands players
- RadioShaqs5 months agoHero@b24073 People who post on here. One was the guy who called me all those names. He even said he hates ea and me but likes the game.
I mean you want 40 games right surely you don’t hate playing it and want to play that many games right?
I mean if you do like it I could see ea adding 40 more. I shouldn’t have to play 40 more games if you don’t even like playing it that makes no sense.
About FC 25 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 19 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago