Forum Discussion
141 Replies
- @lansenyl Right more people are playing and now everyone is playing all 12 games. This means you can no longer out play people who didn’t have time for 40. I think everyone agrees in the old system better players got worse rewards.
I just disagree with saying casuals are not skilled and need to play 40. I’ve had a lot of real life commitments this year and have been super casual so 12 helps me. - lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran
Playing all the games was never a requirement and they still would not be. Play as many as you want and place as best as you can.
There is no logical reason behind lowering the amount of games to 12. If you have your own personal commitments then that's something for you to deal with and work around.
If you felt obligated to play all the matches ontop of completing all your online games then seek counseling for your addiction to the rewards and packs.
I'm sorry but you're doing nothing to convince me that this is a positive change.
- @lansenyl I never played that many is what I am saying. So as a casual player I got less rewards. This forced casuals into the store last year.
A casual player shouldn’t have to rearrange their life schedule simply to try to play a game.
I could see if you couldn’t play past 12 but you can. Just keep playing if you have more time than someone casual. - lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs No one was asking you to rearrange your life schedule to earn better rewards.
But now someone who manipulates, or mods the game online may be more inclined to invest their time in doing the same in squad battles because there are less games.
If the gameplay was better and the anti-cheat worked properly then maybe I would agree that less games is better but 12 is still quite short. @lansenylI think people cheat no matter how many games there is botting was probably even easier on lower difficulty last year.
If the gameplay is better then you would like less games? I would think the more you enjoy it the more you would play it.- lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs If the gameplay was better I would still be asking for more games but your argument would be more justifiable.
- @lansenyl I would want more games if the gameplay was better. My argument would change.
- lansenyl5 months agoSeasoned Veteran@RadioShaqs I think we agree on something!!
- @lansenyl That’s why it’s shocking I’ve never seen so many say they like this game and want to play 40 games. If they like it I support 40 more. I’ve just never seen so many positive reviews of the game. I will just play less.
- polka198102115 months agoNew Adventurer
@R1ckyDaMan19 написал (-а):
@polka19810211Because respect for someone's time is more important than the reward.And what respect and time are you talking about? I have already written earlier. If you don't want to play 40 matches, don't play it's very simple. But when the opportunity to play more is taken away from you, that's the problem. The limitation in entertainment is a problem. Or replacing entertainment with something you don't like. What difference does it make in which mode you spend your time and how much. For me, there were rivals and squad battles modes where the reward was collected. That's what we're playing in UT/mode for, right? It is always better to be able to come back and finish playing for certain rewards than to play 12 matches and then get rewards for 2 matches. Where is the meaning of a man?
About FC 25 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 9 minutes ago
- 9 minutes ago
- 19 minutes ago
- 21 minutes ago