EA_Shepard Lol, well after 15 good years of discussions, it's good to know I shouldn't hold my breath on this one. But, have they had any good ideas on what to do? I'm not sure if you can even disclose any of that, but I'm also not a development wizard either, so my two cents likely wouldn't be worth a couple of peanuts on this one. If there's anything you can share on it though, I'm always curious to brainstorm!
Community ManagerGVRH To be honest, I am not sure about their ideas at the moment. Even if they told me this is what we plan to do, it wouldn't be public knowledge until they publish it in the patch notes. The feedback y'all give on what could happen does go a long way when lots of people give it. That is why i push folks to blast their ideas on threads like these. The more comments, the more ideas, the more something changes. It may take a bit of time, but I have seen a massive amount of changes being made in games due to someone tweeting or a thousand replies to a single thread.
I prefer the engagement "conversation" threads over the bug report ones. Those are easy - Hey i need this info - thanks - send off.
With engagement, i get players personal opinions on game play, mechanics, issues, what could be improved etc. I am old school Prima game guide, and the best way now are threads about something i cannot find or do in game.
EA_Shepard Well I'll shoot you this idea quick. Would it be possible to just add like 30-50M to the cap at the start of each year? Somewhere within these amounts I think would be a good balance. It would allow teams in severe debt to push closer to 0 or leave them just above positive, while also giving other teams room to sign more high profile players without risking that same severe debt. It would need to be tested through a few different franchises to find which number between the lines is most suitable, but I think it would be a decent fix for now since there's no way for organizations to really profit outside of owner mode.
