Y'all should stop giving players a rating just because they have one attribute that's that number. For example, this dak should not be a 94 ovr just because he has a 94 awareness. Every single card that's like this doesn't add up. If the average rating is, let's say, an 88, how does one 94 attribute constitute him to be a 94? How do y'all go about rating the players anyway? Is their a link to something that explains it?
I actually have that site bookmarked, but I guess I should've added in that their rating shouldn't come from attributes that have nothing to do with their position either. Especially since we don't use nor benefit from route running and release for this version of dak. Plus when you look at different players for the same position (in general) they may have the same ovr but one may actual be worth the rating and the other is like how did they even get here comparing them side by side. Why would they even have dak, a qb, with a 90 catch in traffic, release and route running anyway, but then give him an 80 tor? There are players who have overalls with no attributes even close to that (their attributes). Maybe it's just me, but I think the ratings should represent the attributes that actually matter and are used. We're never going to be able to see or use this version of dak as a wr.
