Non-equipped items in the Inventory can be deconstructed by highlighting them and hitting the "X" button (for PC). It's handy at higher levels to get the rare weapons that require vandium to make, deconstruct them and then use the extremely rare components to build what you want with more augment slots.
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes. And in NG+ every item you find is level IX at lvl79, i assume it would be X at lvl80. You won´t get enough research data and mats, not to mention character level, in your first playthru to craft the high-end Advanced -level items anyway
Every damn mod i crafted to N7 Valkyrie just made it worse. Beam emitter, the turn-every-projectile-into-sticky-granade, electricity gun. Is so much better with just some shield, ammo etc. mod and keep it regular otherwise. Well the whole N7 Valkyrie ain´t what it was in ME3, N7 Piranha is the thing now \,,/
@SalarianLawrence wrote:
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes. And in NG+ every item you find is level IX at lvl79, i assume it would be X at lvl80. You won´t get enough research data and mats in your first playthru to craft the high-end Advanced -level items anyway
Every damn mod i crafted to N7 Valkyrie just made it worse. Beam emitter, the turn-every-projectile-into-sticky-granade, electricity gun. Is so much better with just some shield, ammo etc. mod and keep it regular otherwise. Well the whole N7 Valkyrie ain´t what it was in ME3, N7 Piranha is the thing now \,,/
I think any of the bought or reward weapons have only two mod slots. So to get the absolute best weapons, you have to craft them. You want Rare and Ultra-rares with the enhancement from Cryopods so you can have 5 augment slots. Double-mod slot by default and then useful augments (+dam, seeking plasma, sticky grenades, etc).
You don't get that out of random drops.
@SalarianLawrence wrote:
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes.
Ehh, probably because not everybody plays multi-player.
You do make a fair point though. Crafting doesn't really yield much better weaponry, at least not a noticeable difference from what I can tell. I think the itemization in this game really needs help.
@EgoMania wrote:
@SalarianLawrence wrote:
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes.
Ehh, probably because not everybody plays multi-player.
You do make a fair point though. Crafting doesn't really yield much better weaponry, at least not a noticeable difference from what I can tell. I think the itemization in this game really needs help.
Um, I would look at items closer. Because weapon mods and augments can make a huge difference.
@SalarianLawrence wrote:
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes. And in NG+ every item you find is level IX at lvl79, i assume it would be X at lvl80. You won´t get enough research data and mats, not to mention character level, in your first playthru to craft the high-end Advanced -level items anyway
Every damn mod i crafted to N7 Valkyrie just made it worse. Beam emitter, the turn-every-projectile-into-sticky-granade, electricity gun. Is so much better with just some shield, ammo etc. mod and keep it regular otherwise. Well the whole N7 Valkyrie ain´t what it was in ME3, N7 Piranha is the thing now \,,/
With crafting you can add augs. iI you buy a weapon you cant add augs to it. Not sure about multiplayer, never tried MP, have always been a SP person.
@arthurh3535 wrote:
@EgoMania wrote:
@SalarianLawrence wrote:
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes.
Ehh, probably because not everybody plays multi-player.
You do make a fair point though. Crafting doesn't really yield much better weaponry, at least not a noticeable difference from what I can tell. I think the itemization in this game really needs help.
Um, I would look at items closer. Because weapon mods and augments can make a huge difference.
Well here's the thing. I have been crafting stuff up to level VI (normal dificulty playthrough) and I put mods in them and stuff as much as I can. But then I pick up a generic version that drops as loot and I kill enemies at just about the same speed. So if it makes a difference I haven't really noticed anything significant in normal difficulty.
Maybe it does in higher difficulties, that I don't know.
@EgoMania wrote:
@SalarianLawrence wrote:
Why craft anything when you can get bestlevel items from multiplayer to singleplayer via the APEX Pathfinder reward boxes.
Ehh, probably because not everybody plays multi-player.
You do make a fair point though. Crafting doesn't really yield much better weaponry, at least not a noticeable difference from what I can tell. I think the itemization in this game really needs help.
Oh Augs are powerful... Eg if you add a seeking plasma onto your weapon, it becomes more or less like a heat seeking missile, rarely misses... I normally add this to my shotguns... And if you add augs like the bio converter, your weapon doesnt need to reload and have unlimited ammo(will drain your health though), I use this for my sniper rifle(imagine an isharay doing 1.4k damage auto firing without reloading)... Plenty of other augs that I have not experimented on, you can have a look and see what suits your play style.
You cerainly don´t need any 4modslot weapons for Hardcore playthru, cba to even play insanity, would just be mindless repetition and grind for items :d
I much rather use my Sandstorm VII than my crafted N7 Valkyrie IX (with beam emitters, another one with sticky grenade mod...and ofc on top of those the ´normal´´ mods for shields ammo and whatnot. In multiplayer i just pretty much use N7 Piranha or N7 Valiant with any char, those are the best for me.
After starting NG+ with HC pretty cba´d to craft anything anymore and just went with what i found. Oh i used up all the 4k research points i had for Remnant and Heleus * and crafted stuff but it´s just for the heck of it.
Only useable craft is the Heleus Icon Armor.
Anyone with the Pathfinder weapons should stick a Double Mod Slot and Vintage Heat Sink on the SMG. Grab Heavy Lifting from Combat Fitness, Clip Mag Size from Pistols and then put a Scope, Barrel, Magazine and Receiver on it.
You now have a gun with 80+ (continues to grow as you get better magazine mods) rounds per mag, unlimited ammunition and enough damage to quite literally hold down M1 and kill whole groups of enemies before running out of ammo on Normal, or two or three on Hardcore.
Yeah the thing is, I see the numbers but I don't really get the feeling it makes much of a difference on whether I succeed in combat or not.
I know that there is a difference in actual numbers, but let's say that an opponent has 1000 hitpoints and I can have my weapon do 700 or 850 damage. The difference is significant, but I still have to shoot him twice to kill him.
Hope that small example makes it clearer. I do see the number difference but I don't think I'll lose a fight if I have un-augmented gear. Worst case it takes a little longer.
@EgoMania wrote:
I know that there is a difference in actual numbers, but let's say that an opponent has 1000 hitpoints and I can have my weapon do 700 or 850 damage. The difference is significant, but I still have to shoot him twice to kill him.
That's a bad example. We don't boost damage to "one-shot" stuff. It's for the über-high hp enemies like a fiend.
No idea what hp is actually, but lets say it's 10000 (ten or so sniper rifle hits to take one down, doesn't actually even seem high enough). Does start to make a difference if you do 20% more dmg per shot. That much "quicker" to take it down.
@Vellu78 wrote:
@EgoMania wrote:
I know that there is a difference in actual numbers, but let's say that an opponent has 1000 hitpoints and I can have my weapon do 700 or 850 damage. The difference is significant, but I still have to shoot him twice to kill him.
That's a bad example. We don't boost damage to "one-shot" stuff. It's for the über-high hp enemies like a fiend.
No idea what hp is actually, but lets say it's 10000 (ten or so sniper rifle hits to take one down, doesn't actually even seem high enough). Does start to make a difference if you do 20% more dmg per shot. That much "quicker" to take it down.
Well I don't know about you but I play sniper rifles a lot and most enemies I'm fighting are the ones that die relatively quickly. There are a few enemies indeed that are more significant oponents but they are more the exception. But if the idea is that optimising gear is only meant for those tougher opponents then I get what people are on about a bit better. I guess I just don't care so much if those handful of tough fights last 2.5 minutes instead of 2 minutes (just a random example of course).
It's just that the first two playthroughs I really didn't that much with augmenting and now I do on the third playthrough I don't actually feel much of a difference with the first playthroughs.
Maybe I should go to hardcore next and see if I get my behind handed to me hehe.
I mean if you really wanted to you could never choose a profile when it's brought up, never spend any of your skill points and go around killing things with a rank 1 omni blade the entire game.
The point is that if someone wants the 'best' gear, looting it is not an option.
Edit: I should also point out that with things like Assault Rifles and SMGs, without Bioconverters (which I hate) or Vintage Heat Sinks, they tend to run themselves out of ammunition so frequently that the augments become more of a quality of life improvement than a straight upgrade to killing power or anything of the sort.
@EgoMania wrote:
Well I don't know about you but I play sniper rifles a lot and most enemies I'm fighting are the ones that die relatively quickly. There are a few enemies indeed that are more significant oponents but they are more the exception. But if the idea is that optimising gear is only meant for those tougher opponents then I get what people are on about a bit better. I guess I just don't care so much if those handful of tough fights last 2.5 minutes instead of 2 minutes (just a random example of course).
It's just that the first two playthroughs I really didn't that much with augmenting and now I do on the third playthrough I don't actually feel much of a difference with the first playthroughs.
Very true, certainly don't have to boost anything, on normal+ difficulties anyway. But since it's there people like to min-max. On my first playthrough I didn't either and just straight-forward augs and modfiers, nothing fancy.
But on my second run (of which I'm about half-way into) I've been experimenting with the more exotic stuff, like bio-converter and electrical conduits. They can radically change weapon behaviour and suddenly combat flow is entirely different from just straight up pew-pew.
@RotBoti wrote:
I mean if you really wanted to you could never choose a profile when it's brought up, never spend any of your skill points and go around killing things with a rank 1 omni blade the entire game.
The point is that if someone wants the 'best' gear, looting it is not an option.
Edit: I should also point out that with things like Assault Rifles and SMGs, without Bioconverters (which I hate) or Vintage Heat Sinks, they tend to run themselves out of ammunition so frequently that the augments become more of a quality of life improvement than a straight upgrade to killing power or anything of the sort.
Well I get the best gear thing from playing MMOs for years, but there you actually need the gear to win or you won't beat enrage timers and such. A rank 1 omni blade is a silly example of course. I do upgrade at least the rank of the gear. For an assault rifle I like to use one of those Remnant ones that doesn't run out of ammo either. I do augment them now but as I said I don't see any significant difference in my playthrough. I do like a lot of the craftable gear, just not feeling the augmenting bit yet, but I did see a couple of suggestions I will try. They seem to make sense and I'll see if that makes my life in game better.
Ranking weaponry...
What would be like if enemies weaknesses were based on these ranks? For example, SUPPOSE we have to get to level 10 to be able to upgrade weapons to II. Enemies in level 9 would be normally affected by Level I weaponry, and be marginally weaker to Level II and extremely much more weaker against III. Such would be the opposite. Trying to take down an enemy worth of Level V weaponry with a level I would be hard. Differences between levels would be consistent if proper designed. Beyond lv 10-worth-weaponry would stand enemies slightly more resistant than before. Bullet sponges are so waste of time.
@PandaTar wrote:
Ranking weaponry...
What would be like if enemies weaknesses were based on these ranks? For example, SUPPOSE we have to get to level 10 to be able to upgrade weapons to II. Enemies in level 9 would be normally affected by Level I weaponry, and be marginally weaker to Level II and extremely much more weaker against III. Such would be the opposite. Trying to take down an enemy worth of Level V weaponry with a level I would be hard. Differences between levels would be consistent if proper designed. Beyond lv 10-worth-weaponry would stand enemies slightly more resistant than before. Bullet sponges are so waste of time.
Yeah other games I've played have done things like that. I had to kinda of laugh at how rank III actualy requires level 10. As if I had the materials or need to craft anything before level 10. The first two ranks seem completely superfluous.
Bullet sponges are boring but in ME:A I must admit to being more annoyed by the enemy AI. They can move really fast at times and of course that takes a lot of energy so they often have to hide behind cover for two minutes to recuperate.
Well, the example was a hyperbolic one but it's completely relevant to my current play-through. I am currently stuck with a level 2 Pathfinder Ranger as you cannot salvage the deluxe weapons (yay bugs!) and I've yet to find another VHS. I also love the way the Deep Space Explorer armor looks, so I never upgrade my armor either. However the VHS is such a large QoL improvement for me that I would rather it take longer to kill than give up my augments.
Honestly, I can agree with you that I find most of the augments are lack-luster at best and I really hope we see a lot more diversity in their selection as patches and DLC are put in the game. As it stands I only find use for VHS and Shield Oscillators (when I used the Heleus Defender set to do a powers run) for the ones you have to research. The fire-mode augmentations are currently bugged and cannot be purchased, but I would use those for several things. And the rest of the generic augments are alright if you want to min-max, but I can't put that many augments in a gun and as far as I can tell you can't craft another set of Explorer armor with augments (unless that's bugged too, but probably not).
In other words I spent a grand total of 200 MW research points for two play-throughs and never opened the research screen again.
Edit: There's also the very real annoyance of not being able to put leg, arm and chest modifications on whole-body chest pieces.
Ahh I see your point with the VHS.
Yeah, it's tricky like that. It seems to be that it would've been so much easier to have a system where you can simply rip the mods out at a small credit cost for example and then stick em in another piece of gear will crafting, but that's my days of SWTOR talking hehe.
The whole system of loot, crafting, research, inventory, buy/sell, deconstruct, augment and consumables should be revised, very, very carefully.
@PandaTar wrote:
The whole system of loot, crafting, research, inventory, buy/sell, deconstruct, augment and consumables should be revised, very, very carefully.
I actually find it to be pretty cool and useful already. I don't understand why it needs a change unless it has an actual problem.
If we are talking about understanding, both of us understand different things. That's that. Obviously, I'm on the disadvantage, given my understanding sees the current mechanics utterly bad-designed, although 'it works'. On the other hand, you are on the advantage, because it's just like you'd judge ok.
@PandaTar wrote:
If we are talking about understanding, both of us understand different things. That's that. Obviously, I'm on the disadvantage, given my understanding sees the current mechanics utterly bad-designed, although 'it works'. On the other hand, you are on the advantage, because it's just like you'd judge ok.
What is 'utterly bad-designed' actually mean? You don't understand how the slots work? How you can get extra slots? What you can slot into them? What benefits they give?
Complaining without _any_ specifics is just griping.
I was talking holistically, regarding the previous post, not only augment allotting. I understand how the mechanics work and I understanding, by my own means, how they could be improved by my own reasoning and I have pointed out in another thread days ago, which makes me unwilling to elaborate them here again.
And again, that's about personal reasoning, you may agree or not with it, even if one understands, you see.
