I don't agree with his sentiment. He was needlessly aggressive/hostile in a situation which could be defused by having some idea what is going on.
People don't enjoy spending money on broken items which they cannot return. This guy decides to pick a fight with another user using falsehoods (10 year old game, you get what you pay for, etc).
The get what you pay for is the hardest one to ignore. It doesn't make it right for anyone to advertise a full-functioning product and charge any fee for it. Had customers known the product was damaged (and this has been a known issue since 2010, probably earlier), and could then judge the value of the product before purchasing. Instead, EA/Origin/Amazon opted to hide this information from consumers.
Further, to then falsely claim that customers do not have the right to demand a refund of said damaged goods is a violation of Magnusson-Moss.
That EA was unaware is false- they have responded, in these forums, to this problem in ages past with no solution.
Guys, there is no solution to this problem. Well, there is, but it would cause you to violate your user agreement in applying the fix. So for all legal intents and purposes- customers have purchased a faulty product from a company which knowingly chose to deceive their customers.
How does that make you feel?
P.S. you can get your money back from Amazon, or wherever you purchased this. Magnusson-Moss covers all transactions. Google is your friend, file a quick complaint if you please: EA is in violation of U.S. federal law.
P.P.S. I've already done this. I do not want to play a game which is broken, then be told, as PlayFairCypher suggests, that I should be thrilled to have my broken game.