No childs?
So you know in every ME you can "romance". But i would like to see some ways to get children with other species and then have them as companions to play with. Would be a fun way to make romancing mor...
Forum Discussion
@EgoMania wrote:
Well you come back again with the same argument that it's done many times before and I still reply the same thing...just because it's been done, doesn't make it a good idea. I think it's irresponsible to do such a thing, particularly because you are the Pathfinder especially in a story where things happen like boarding Kett ships and all that.
In the end it may not be a military ship but you're exploring in a warzone with it. It's down right irresponsible to take children into a warzone especially if you can't even defend yourself. Again the argument that it was done before or even was common practice doesn't make it a good idea.
But let's look at the game and story development itself. To me, having children in this situation, would significantly have to change your choices and decisions unless indeed you like to be the reckless parent and just not care. But then why have kids? They're not accessories.
But would you go on board of a Kett cruiser, would you take the same risks you do now if you had children? If the answer is yes, then in my book you're an irresponsible parent. If the answer is no, then it would complicate the story writing and decision trees that you get because they would be significantly different.
I remember a scene from Babylon 5 where the main character gets married and at some point he has to go to war and his (half-alien) wife goes back to her home planet. One of the reason is she tells him that he should be able to make certain decisions and with her around, he wouldn't be able to make those decisions.
I firmly believe that this is true and with children even more so. Having children and still doing the same exact things would just not be believable to me. And besides, you just came out of stasis. I don't see having a pregnant protagonist or jumping years into the future as really interesting options for the story, but at that point of course that's also just my opinion.
Sadly, after the Skyllian Blitz, Elysium, Mindior, Terra Nova, Eden Prime, Shanxi, Horizon, Freedom's Progress, Feros, Omega gang wars, Geth Attack on the Citadel, Cora's family freighter, etc., by your example, the only place in the Universe that Humans should be having babies is Earth, and we (the players) all know what happens there. Lets look at Initiative space. Eos still has plenty of Kett floating around, even if you take out the base and haven't managed to start a war over water with Advent. Havarl isn't really a colony, but it is still crawling with remnant, Rokaar, and hostile flora and fauna on the off chance someone decides to have kids there. Voeld is a straight-up warzone even after we hit the Kett base and exaltation facility. Kedara is still crawling in trigger happy exiles and a strong Rokaar presence. Elaaden has exiles and scavs, not to mention the Worm and the Krogan neighbors who will be taking over/out the colony the next time Tann crosses the line with Morda. The Nexus is still largely a crippled wreck which has barely survived terrorist attacks, dangerous protests, open revolt, and being boarded by the kett, not to mention being the largest sitting duck on Helios. Meridian is filled with who-knows-what which can pose any number of dangers, is still a sitting duck for the Kett, and happens to be a large Remnant structure floating nice and close to a massive Scourge cloud, which happens to have an appetite for Remnant tech. So, by your terms there ISN'T anywhere "safe" enough in Andromeda to have kids.
Empirically though, while your argument is well-intentioned, humanity has a long history of having kids in risky situations. From Stone Age caves, to lands racked with war, to far-flung colonies tenuously clinging to existence, to the ships and planets drifting precariously through the Terminus, to Andromeda, and beyond, humanity has not let the risks involved interfere with chasing, or producing, the future. Additionally, for the last 80 years, the Angara have been living for the most part in occupied worlds where they and their families could be taken by the Kett at any time or buried in the rubble of a ruined settlement. Not to mention the Krogan, who face death with every sunrise, and find birth not a risk but a victory. I am sure that the Turians, Salariens, and Asari have similar situations and histories. One thing is certain, for everyone who came to Andromeda the future is worth any risk, and, like their pioneer ancestors, caveman or colonist, children are not only an acceptable risk, they are an imperative. Summatively, while your concerns are understandable, for most of the free peoples of Helios they are irrelevant.
Anyway, not only is Ryder the individual in Helios most capable of taking care of themselves, we also cruise around in the only Initiative ship not wrecked, boarded by Kett, or both. It is also stealthed and has at least 4 goons onboard at any given time with nothing better to do than to be babysitters/bodyguards. Considering all of Helios is effectively a warzone, there isn't anywhere (except maybe Aya) that is safer.
While I do agree that kids mean that you generally need to stop doing stupid stuff for its own sake, it may still be required to protect your people or complete your mission, and that is something you cannot shirk. This challenge to balance family and duty is one that is faced daily by military, police, firefighters, and many others across the world. If they can do it so can Ryder.
Although, if Sara gets pregnant Scott will be carrying most of the Pathfinder load for a few months at least.
Mankind has a long history of being a race of stumbling fools. I am too rational to fall for your wall of text regurgitations of "it's been done so it's ok" argumentation.
Your empirical approach only shows that humans can be persistent, not that it's a good idea. We are a screwed up race as it is. Look at the world and then try to convince anyone we are an advanced, enlightened species in this universe. Even just saying it makes me laugh.
A poet once said: If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
I firmly believe in that.
Now I don't think we are going to even remotely see eye to eye on this, so I think there is wisdom in agreeing to disagree as the saying goes.
Fair enough. It's kind of a case of Not Smart/Recommended vs Don't Care/Beats The Alternative. I did enjoy the debate though.
This would actually be interesting for the next game. Ryder can decide to start having kids or not, and wind up supporting unrestricted childbirth or Nexus control of reproduction, with significant impacts on the game, kind of like backing Mages or Templars over the course of DA2, with the possibility of one or more colonies revolting/attempting to secede along the way over this and other issues (see Browncoats thread). So you could back the Initiative being "smart", cautious, etc. about reproduction, and I could support the colonists going for it all out, and we could each take the consequences of our choices.
Anyway, if we're going to be quoting poetry, I think I'll go with Kipling
Oh, East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,
Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God's great Judgment Seat;
But there is neither East nor West, Border, nor Breed, nor Birth,
When two strong men stand face to face, though they come from the ends of the earth!
-from the Ballad of East and West
But to-day I leave the galley. Shall I curse her service then?
God be thanked! Whate'er comes after, I have lived and toiled with Men!-from the Galley Slave
So i see this posts with people arguing: is is safe to have kids in Andromeda and where is it safe.
In the first MEA no it isn't, not only it isn't but there is no place to raise them this is why we have birth control to begin with.
But after we have made new colonies which are getting bigger an safer, made the planets good for life growing and finally got control of Meridian, the planets are actually pretty safe to start repopulation just like the game tells us in the end.
So I think childs will not only be normal to have but a natural continuation to the story, as to someone saying well there are still Kett around well.. the Kett will always be around so you suggestion is for Milky Way species to keep fighting to die until the extinction? There will never be a 100% safe place for children's but this doesn't mean not to procreate and repopulate, after all Arks came to Andromeda with around 20000 lifes on each other so we can't hope in a miracle that someday Kett will suddenly disappear.
We made the Helius cluster safe to be able to live and repopulate and I think a child won't be a distraction to Ryder and his loved one, on contrary it will give them a bigger reason to keep fighting and make a better home the kids, otherwise no one should have babies because they would get distracted from their mission, after all even in real life a baby gives you a reason to keep workin and fighting to guarantee him/her a better future.
P.s. Not really a fan of childrens being rise on the Tempest after all it is a work place (maybe a visit some time 🙂)Well, debating things is fun but once I see that people are basically repeating their same arguments without any movement I lose interest, even if I'm one of the parties involved myself. 🙂 I just realised I was repeating myself as were you, so that's why I decided it was enough for me at least.
Nice poetry though.
@KerandG wrote:
P.s. Not really a fan of childrens being rise on the Tempest after all it is a work place (maybe a visit some time 🙂)Only problem with that is that while Keri and the Angara lady have homes on the Nexus or Aya, Reyes is either on the run or living in a loud, dirty Biker Bar/Strip Joint in the wrong part of town where he is running a massive criminal organization. As for Ryder, the other LIs, and presumably Ryder twin, they live on the Tempest, so where else are the kids going to be raised?
The Tempest is one of those places that is both a work place and a place to live (like shops that have apartments on the upper stories), especially for Ryder, who has this fancy giant room.
@EgoMania wrote:Nice poetry though.
Thanks! Maybe we should start a poetry thread. Did you ever remember who wrote your poetry?
@fudgietroll wrote:
@EgoMania wrote:Nice poetry though.
Thanks! Maybe we should start a poetry thread. Did you ever remember who wrote your poetry?
Yes, it was Anatole France.
@fudgietroll wrote:
@KerandG wrote:
P.s. Not really a fan of childrens being rise on the Tempest after all it is a work place (maybe a visit some time 🙂)Only problem with that is that while Keri and the Angara lady have homes on the Nexus or Aya, Reyes is either on the run or living in a loud, dirty Biker Bar/Strip Joint in the wrong part of town where he is running a massive criminal organization. As for Ryder, the other LIs, and presumably Ryder twin, they live on the Tempest, so where else are the kids going to be raised?
The Tempest is one of those places that is both a work place and a place to live (like shops that have apartments on the upper stories), especially for Ryder, who has this fancy giant room.
Well it depends how you see it, sure now in MEA sure no one has a "house" but this is because thei didn't really had a lot of choise to be honest 🙂, But in the next Andromeda things will change i mean every colony is growing, they have great plans for Meridian and Ryder even has a entire planet named by him/her 🙂
In the current game it is impossible even to think of childs so ask for them is pointless, but in the next Andromeda would be awesome, don't really care where if on Tempest or some other place.
P.s. F..k Keri, that girl is like "i told the bartender to look out for you know who (your LI) and let us know if he/she is coming" then you are forced to cheat on your loved one, and after feeling like sh..t i was like "Nope thanks" reloaded the game and i still have that quest unfinished. So yeah... F..k Keri 🙂 (until they fix it)
