It would be a nice feature but there is honestly no way of ensuring integrity.
- The PS3 Demon's Souls gave you the option to "rate" players and hosts would almost always downvote someone who did all the work for them, died (through no fault of their own), and even successfully helped them defeat a boss.
- Metal Gear Online players would boot good players on the opposite team because it gave them a better chance of winning (getting tossed would negate any CR/RP equivelent changes).
- That Deep Down game capcom was supposedly working on 10 years ago (man I loved the trailer, wish it went through), was going to give players a letter ranking that would eventually lead to rank based matching - nooooo bueno.
I can totally see console fanboys downvoting eachother just for the sake of it and team rivals would be a pain. Toronto fan? Eww, downvote. I'm a Montreal fan so I'm gonna get blasted by Boston, etc.
EASHL would be chaos and drop ins would just add fuel to trolling.
Also also, Sony scrapped the accolade feature because nobody was using it. I believe I got around 50 since it's launched and that was probably only due to me spamming it at the end of a round
I don't think this was meant to be interpreted as a "voting" or "rating" system. It would purely be for you as a player to identify which gamertags you had good interactions with and which ones you want to avoid. No one else would or should be able to see what players you mark as good or bad.
