TheWev1988
9 days agoRising Scout
CHEL Richards
Did 34 sets to try and get Chel Richards
results: 20 Girardis and 14 Shaws. What do we need to do to get Kozlov ? EA_Aljo
Did 34 sets to try and get Chel Richards
results: 20 Girardis and 14 Shaws. What do we need to do to get Kozlov ? EA_Aljo
Any luck getting a % on the chance of getting Kozlov? Or how many packs opened dropped Kozlov (again, as a %)? Should be pretty easy data for a person to pull
what a great lesson for the community about what EA is doing in this game!
Sorry about that. The set worked as intended. I've let the team know about the feedback here so it potentially can be used in the future.
What do you mean by "currently"? That set is no longer available. It expired on Friday. It was only available for 2 days.
Disappointing to hear that considering it’s easier to get the higher Chel week cards than it was the Richards. Even when doing the upgrade sets for a chance at a card between two overalls the higher overall seems to pack the same amount as the lower. (78/79 or 80/81 and so on.) clearly a lot of people had issues with this card and it was such a waste of fodder and coins and if we knew that it would be super rare we would not have.
That set is working as intended currently. I've relayed the feedback to the team. We'll have to wait and see if any changes come.
any update to this issue that multiple people had with this set? Any chance we are going to be able to get Richards ?
I was willing to see this as a mistake on EA's part. If it was deliberate, then it was very unethical and I cannot defend them and their exploitative model
Define ‘rare’ as a % of cards pulled from those packs, please…
Why did you want one of the 3 cards to be higher overall and thus more rare than the others? Why did you not want to have equal odds for all 3 cards that we needed to collect?
And even if all 3 cards had been the same overall, why did you want the Girardi/Shaw/Kozlov set to be random? To get Richards, people needed to complete the Girardi/Shaw/Kozlov set different numbers of times depending on luck. Why did you want it to be like that? Why did you not want to have guaranteed sets for the 3 cards that we needed to collect so that all of us would have had an equal chance to get Richards?
You were also asked how much more rare the 83 Kozlov was than the 82 Girardi and Shaw. What is the answer to that question? It would be very nice to know because some of us didn't get all 3 cards despite completing the Girardi/Shaw/Kozlov set dozens of time. It should definitely not have been like that. One card should definitely not have been that much more rare than the others.