Hi,
I don't know for you, but since Nvidia has released the 1080 GTX, I bought a new machine and two of them in SLI. I can play any games at 4K Ultra setting at around 100FPS.
Hockey is a fast pace action sport and console are lacking FPS and programmers often has to balance graphics and speed...
I pay every year for the console version, but from NHl15 to NHL17, we could have had a little update from EA, and that would have been fine. There is no graphic improvement in 3 years. Same announcements, no more music between plays like it was in previous years. It's really getting to a point why it's not a DLC, example : DLC16, DLC17 and the day they do a real new version V.2.0, they can charge 80$. Now it's a rip off.
That's the reason why I am saying a new way to bring users to another level is to offer intense graphic via PC gaming. There won't be hacking; it's a multiplayer games with constant updates. Who will play offline? Come on. It's not Tomb Raider where you can be offline.
I think there is a good door since Nvidia pushed the limits with this new baby in 4K. There is even room for NHL in VR. That's why EA has to jump back in PC action or they might have a surprise with other vendors that may be interrested in going that path.
Can you imagine NHL at 4K ultra settings with 60fps+ solid? I would pay 80$ without a arguing. Right now, I am because there is no revolution in the graphics at all. NHL17 is the same product as NHL15 (not talking about gameplay.. passes.. or * like that that can also be done on PS1 if you know what i mean). The point here is "powerful" machine that are available right now and that are not mainstream. Console will need to adapt and let users to increase memory/graphic cards or they won't survive with how solid is Microsoft Windows 10's idea of bringing gamers back their world (PC). They don't care about consoles selling, they care about selling you air : games/apps that cost them only hours. Console are expensive in research and development and 2-3 years are outdated now.
#4K #VR