Forum Discussion
Omg, no wonder you're all too good for this game, since you've all been playing golf games since the beginning of times. And all those devs at EA are probably in their 30s or 40s, they can't imagine players that good.
Kind of funny reading about old games. I remember not that long ago, we were cleaning that big closet in the basement. There was a box of floppy disks I wanted to throw in the garbage. Dad didn't want to throw it out, and absolutely wanted to keep them. I said 'dad, we don't have computer playing that stuff'. He pulled out this big old gaming computer in there and showed me it could played that floppy disk. It was some kind of Leisure Suit Larry game with really bad graphics.
So you're all saying it's ok for beerrun to shoot down my opinion because isn't how he wants to play but when I respond in like, it's not ok. And then ageist references like it's ok for you to say it's not ok to mention how long I've been playing but you all can have your say about your misinterpreted view starting from the original post.
No hypocrisy here. Instead of us all rallying together to get EA to see our views let's rather shoot down each other and argue with ourselves instead of focusing on what matters.
Had anyone bothered to realise that my original post was calling out EAs algorithm that is the code for 2-16 players is what makes the 1-4 player option not possible work because they can't or don't want to integrate new code to accommodate the entire selection of gameplay that would suit everyone.
It's something said pre-release would be done in the first major update and why many still purchased it.
But hey you all have your opinion and along away. My gripe is with EA and anyone thinking they can say my opinion is worth less than theirs.
- 2 years ago
@yusd25 wrote:So you're all saying it's ok for beerrun to shoot down my opinion because isn't how he wants to play but when I respond in like, it's not ok. And then ageist references like it's ok for you to say it's not ok to mention how long I've been playing but you all can have your say about your misinterpreted view starting from the original post.
No hypocrisy here. Instead of us all rallying together to get EA to see our views let's rather shoot down each other and argue with ourselves instead of focusing on what matters.
Had anyone bothered to realise that my original post was calling out EAs algorithm that is the code for 2-16 players is what makes the 1-4 player option not possible work because they can't or don't want to integrate new code to accommodate the entire selection of gameplay that would suit everyone.
It's something said pre-release would be done in the first major update and why many still purchased it.
But hey you all have your opinion and along away. My gripe is with EA and anyone thinking they can say my opinion is worth less than theirs.
I am happy to listen to your objections... I'm just having problems understanding what they are. I don't know what platform you are on but when I want to play with 3 friends we just create a private match.
- 2 years ago
@yusd25 wrote:So you're all saying it's ok for beerrun to shoot down my opinion because isn't how he wants to play but when I respond in like, it's not ok. And then ageist references like it's ok for you to say it's not ok to mention how long I've been playing but you all can have your say about your misinterpreted view starting from the original post.
No hypocrisy here. Instead of us all rallying together to get EA to see our views let's rather shoot down each other and argue with ourselves instead of focusing on what matters.
Had anyone bothered to realise that my original post was calling out EAs algorithm that is the code for 2-16 players is what makes the 1-4 player option not possible work because they can't or don't want to integrate new code to accommodate the entire selection of gameplay that would suit everyone.
It's something said pre-release would be done in the first major update and why many still purchased it.
But hey you all have your opinion and along away. My gripe is with EA and anyone thinking they can say my opinion is worth less than theirs.
I for one don’t care if someone argues against someone’s else’s opinion, I just rather try to keep it friendly without antagonist language like implying they lack a clue. As far as the age stuff goes, the rest of us just used your comment to start reminiscing, but none of us implied that due to our ages our opinion mattered more. There’s a bit of a difference there.
Anyway, I don’t have a problem with your desire for a 2-4 person turn based stroke play. I have a small group of friends I’d play that with. I just don’t want it at the expense of eliminating the current onlline 2-16.- yusd252 years agoSeasoned Rookie
@7AnimalMother never said or meant I want it gone, it's just apparent that's it is the thing that doesn't allow for another form of traditional stroke play. Until Ryder cup. If it's there then why can't it be full time. Btw I and a few friends have tried to get an online stroke in the tour , Sim and pro 2to 16 games dozens of times, only my a friend in Cali has had 1 successful match up with 2 only so 3 players, but only matches we get are each other maybe it's the Australian time difference but 30 of us that I know of all are in that time zone
About PGA Tour Franchise Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 4 days ago
- 6 days ago
- 6 days ago
- 6 days ago