Grave buster must be improved
That card is 100% useless if opponent have not gravestone zombies on his deck.
It occupies one really important card slot on those heroes that don't even have proper way to draw new cards. And eve...
Forum Discussion
@Azombioso why not? Look at teleport... play a zombie out of turn and draw a card... one cost.
And while every class can have tombstones, 1. they don't have to use them, 2. Zombies have zero cards that rely on my having a certain class of card in my plant deck for you to be able to play. So... why not?
And while every class can have tombstones, 1. they don't have to use them, 2. Zombies have zero cards that rely on my having a certain class of card in my plant deck for you to be able to play. So... why not?
@daalnnii Because drawing a card is one of the most expensive mechanics in (almost) all card games.
Look for example at the Cell Phone Zombie. It is a 1/1 that costs 2 brains, but almost all the cards within that cost have around 5 points of stats (2/3, 3/2, 1/4, etc).
IF the card should be reworked (which I still think it shouldn't), I think it should be something like: Grave Buster (2 suns): Summon a 2/2. When played: If a Gravestone is in it's lane, destroy it and destroy this plant.
In this case you get a small plant and the possibility of the same effect (destroy a Gravestone).
@Azombioso This would put it on equal footings as Squirrel Herder. That would be an ok change (if change there MUST be)
- Teleport. A 1 cost draw card with an effect that "breaks" the rules of the game. Not even randomly. You get to choose how it breaks. That's the reason i put that card in my previous.
Card draw is expensive. Drawing cards is powerful... but you cant tell me a 2 cost card that had a situational ability would be OP when there is a card that isn't situational with a game standard "breaking" ability on the other side that only costs 1... that has prof/valk as proof of its strong ability... decks are built around that 1 cost. Even with draw card on gravebuster... i cant think of any deck that would be built around it.
I dont think the op asking for either/or is unwarranted. When standard is 3 cost for two cards, 2 cost for 1 isn't out of line. Hell, i dint think it doing both at the sane time is overpowered.
Also... you and i don't catch each other on here much. I play devils advocate often. I don't even really run decks with gravebuster in it. Im not really that concerned... just raising points and counterpoints. Discussion is good. I'm not trolling, just like discussing things like this. I agree with the op, but don't think keeping it the same or reworking it would be game changingDon't get me wrong, I don't think it would be OP by any means. I guess the truth is I wouldn't care weather they change it or not. 🙂
Drawing a card from a card is not powerfull lol.
Anyway changing it to 2/2 zombie would be ok too imo.
